feat: make search results more ergonomic #498
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CyanVoxel
added
Type: Refactor
CyanVoxel
reviewed
Sep 12, 2024
CyanVoxel
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the current return type of
search_library()is a bit unergonomic - it returns a tuple of:(total_count, page_items), so the result needs to be assigned into two items, which is error-proneThis should make it better - it returns
SearchResultwhich is a wrapper fortotal_countandpage_items, but it can still be treated just as list of items