Be less strict about the requested SwiftLint version

[Supereg]

Be less strict about the requested SwiftLint version

♻️ Current situation & Problem

We currently fixed SwiftLint at upToNextMinor. This makes it harder for projects depending on XCTRuntimeAssertions to upgrade their swiftlint version (and SwiftSyntax version). Also the CI always uses the latest version. Therefore, we accept just any 0.x release.

⚙️ Release Notes

• Be less strict about the requested SwiftLint version

📚 Documentation

--

✅ Testing

--

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[Supereg]

It seems like visionOS and watchOS simulators aren't installed anymore?

[PSchmiedmayer]

Sounds good; thank you!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.48%. Comparing base (7ce2801) to head (52738e8).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.48%   91.48%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         305      305           
=======================================
  Hits          279      279           
  Misses         26       26           

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7ce2801...52738e8. Read the comment docs.

[PSchmiedmayer]

I re-installed the simulators on all runners @Supereg.

[Supereg]

I re-installed the simulators on all runners @Supereg.

Thank you 🚀