jwt api implementation #62
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@indraniBan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive JWT (JSON Web Token) authentication mechanism to the inventory management system. The changes include adding JWT-related dependencies to the project's POM file, creating utility classes for token generation, validation, and cookie management, and configuring environment-specific properties for JWT secret management. The implementation provides a robust framework for handling user authentication, token validation, and secure access to application endpoints. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant JwtUserIdValidationFilter
participant JwtAuthenticationUtil
participant JwtUtil
participant UserLoginRepo
Client->>JwtUserIdValidationFilter: Send Request
JwtUserIdValidationFilter->>JwtAuthenticationUtil: Validate JWT Token
JwtAuthenticationUtil->>JwtUtil: Validate Token
JwtUtil-->>JwtAuthenticationUtil: Token Claims
JwtAuthenticationUtil->>UserLoginRepo: Verify User
UserLoginRepo-->>JwtAuthenticationUtil: User Validation Result
alt Token Valid
JwtAuthenticationUtil-->>JwtUserIdValidationFilter: Allow Request
JwtUserIdValidationFilter-->>Client: Process Request
else Token Invalid
JwtUserIdValidationFilter-->>Client: 401 Unauthorized
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/FilterConfig.java (1)
8-9: Add class-level documentationConsider adding Javadoc to describe the purpose of this configuration class and its role in JWT authentication.
+/** + * Configuration class that registers filters for JWT authentication and user validation. + * This class is part of the JWT authentication mechanism that secures API endpoints. + */ @Configuration public class FilterConfig {src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUtil.java (3)
19-20: Security Consideration: Store SECRET_KEY SecurelyStoring the
SECRET_KEYas aStringmay pose security risks since strings are immutable and can linger in memory. Consider storing it as achar[]orbyte[]and clearing it after use to minimize the risk of exposure.
22-22: Make EXPIRATION_TIME ConfigurableThe token expiration time is hardcoded to 24 hours (line 22). To provide flexibility across different environments and use cases, consider externalizing
EXPIRATION_TIMEto the application properties.
26-30: Clarify Exception Message for Missing SECRET_KEYThe exception message in
getSigningKey()refers specifically toapplication.properties(line 27). Since the secret key might be configured in various property files, consider updating the message to a more general statement like "JWT secret key is not configured."src/main/environment/common_ci.properties (1)
9-9: Security Advice: Secure Management of JWT Secret KeyStoring the JWT secret key directly in property files (line 9) may lead to security vulnerabilities if these files are ever exposed or checked into version control. Consider using environment variables or a secrets management service to securely handle sensitive configurations like the JWT secret key.
src/main/environment/common_example.properties (1)
12-12: Security Advice: Secure Management of JWT Secret KeyIncluding the JWT secret key directly in property files (line 12) can pose a security risk if the files are compromised or stored in version control. It's advisable to use environment variables or a dedicated secrets management solution to securely store and access the JWT secret key.
src/main/environment/common_test.properties (1)
13-13: Ensure test environment security isolationTest environments should use different JWT secrets than production, but still maintain security standards:
- Use a different strong secret for test environment
- Ensure test data and configurations don't leak into production
Consider implementing environment-specific secret management:
# Test-specific JWT secret (still needs to be secure) jwt.secret=${TEST_JWT_SECRET_KEY}src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/repo/users/UserLoginRepo.java (2)
14-15: Consider adding security and performance optimizationsThe query implementation is secure but could benefit from additional improvements:
- Consider adding caching for frequently accessed users
- Add index hint for userID field
- Consider adding rate limiting for this endpoint
- Add logging for security audit purposes
Example implementation with improvements:
@Repository public interface UserLoginRepo extends CrudRepository<Users, Long> { @Query(value = " SELECT /*+ INDEX(u idx_users_userid) */ u FROM Users u WHERE u.userID = :userID AND u.deleted = false ") @Cacheable(value = "users", key = "#userID") public Users getUserByUserID(@Param("userID") Long userID); }
11-12: Add documentation for repository usageConsider adding Javadoc to document:
- The purpose of this repository in JWT authentication
- Expected usage patterns
- Security considerations
Example documentation:
/** * Repository for user authentication and JWT validation. * This repository provides methods to validate user existence and status * as part of the JWT authentication process. * * @see com.iemr.inventory.data.user.Users */ @Repository public interface UserLoginRepo extends CrudRepository<Users, Long> {src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/CookieUtil.java (1)
15-25: Consider using Stream API for more concise implementationThe current implementation can be simplified using Java streams, making it more readable and maintainable.
- public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) { - Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); - if (cookies != null) { - for (Cookie cookie : cookies) { - if (cookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) { - return Optional.of(cookie.getValue()); - } - } - } - return Optional.empty(); - } + public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) { + Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); + return cookies == null ? Optional.empty() : + Arrays.stream(cookies) + .filter(cookie -> cookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) + .map(Cookie::getValue) + .findFirst(); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
pom.xml(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_ci.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_dev.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_example.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_test.properties(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/data/user/Users.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/repo/users/UserLoginRepo.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/CookieUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/FilterConfig.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUtil.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/FilterConfig.java (3)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate
The necessary Spring imports for filter registration and configuration are present.
11-17: Consider security implications and filter ordering
While the implementation looks correct, there are several important considerations:
- The filter is applied to all endpoints ("/*"). Verify if certain endpoints (like health checks or public APIs) should be excluded.
- The filter ordering is not specified, which could lead to unexpected behavior if multiple filters exist.
Let's verify the existence of other filters and potential public endpoints:
Consider these improvements:
@Bean
public FilterRegistrationBean<JwtUserIdValidationFilter> jwtUserIdValidationFilter(JwtAuthenticationUtil jwtAuthenticationUtil) {
FilterRegistrationBean<JwtUserIdValidationFilter> registrationBean = new FilterRegistrationBean<>();
registrationBean.setFilter(new JwtUserIdValidationFilter(jwtAuthenticationUtil));
registrationBean.addUrlPatterns("/*"); // Apply filter to all API endpoints
+ // Set filter order to ensure it runs after authentication but before business logic
+ registrationBean.setOrder(2);
+ // Exclude paths that don't require JWT validation
+ registrationBean.addInitParameter("excludedPaths", "/actuator/health,/public/*");
return registrationBean;
}12-15: Verify the implementation of dependent components
The filter configuration depends on two crucial components that need verification:
JwtUserIdValidationFilter: Ensure it properly handles token validation and error casesJwtAuthenticationUtil: Verify its token validation logic
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the JwtUserIdValidationFilter implementation since it wasn't found in the previous search.
Let me get the complete implementation of the doFilter method since it was cut off, and also check for any whitelisted paths or security configurations.
Let me get the remaining part of the filter implementation since it was cut off at a crucial point.
Based on the comprehensive review of the implementation, I can now provide the final response:
JWT token validation implementation is properly structured and secure
The filter implementation shows proper security measures:
- Validates JWT tokens from both cookie and header sources
- Properly handles public endpoints through whitelisting
- Implements proper error handling and logging
- Securely manages cookies including cleanup of sensitive data
- Correctly integrates with JwtAuthenticationUtil for token validation
The dependent components work together securely:
- JwtAuthenticationUtil validates both token and userId
- JwtUtil handles token parsing with proper error handling
- Filter chain proceeds only after successful validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of dependent components
echo "Checking JwtUserIdValidationFilter implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtUserIdValidationFilter {
$$$
}'
echo "Checking JwtAuthenticationUtil implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtAuthenticationUtil {
$$$
}'
echo "Checking for token validation logic..."
rg -A 10 "validateToken|verifyToken"
Length of output: 3861
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JwtUserIdValidationFilter implementation with ripgrep
echo "Searching for JwtUserIdValidationFilter implementation..."
rg -A 20 "class JwtUserIdValidationFilter"
# Search for filter chain or doFilter implementations
echo "Searching for doFilter implementation..."
rg -A 10 "doFilter.*HttpServletRequest"
Length of output: 2730
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete filter implementation
echo "Getting complete JwtUserIdValidationFilter implementation..."
rg -A 40 "public void doFilter.*ServletRequest"
# Check for security configurations or whitelisted paths
echo "Checking for security configurations..."
rg -A 10 "antMatchers|permitAll|ignorePatterns|excludePatterns"
Length of output: 5014
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete filter implementation using a different approach
echo "Getting the full filter implementation..."
rg -A 80 "class JwtUserIdValidationFilter"
# Also check for any helper methods in the filter
echo "Checking for helper methods..."
rg -A 10 "private.*getJwtTokenFromCookies|private.*clearUserIdCookie"
Length of output: 11434
| public Claims validateToken(String token) { | ||
| try { | ||
| return Jwts.parserBuilder() | ||
| .setSigningKey(getSigningKey()) | ||
| .build() | ||
| .parseClaimsJws(token) | ||
| .getBody(); | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { | ||
| return null; // Handle token parsing/validation errors | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve Exception Handling in validateToken Method
In the validateToken method, catching all exceptions and returning null (lines 57-58) may obscure the root cause of token validation failures. This practice can make debugging difficult and may not distinguish between different error scenarios. Consider throwing specific exceptions or returning error codes to provide clearer feedback on why validation failed.
| @Autowired | ||
| private final CookieUtil cookieUtil; | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private final JwtUtil jwtUtil; | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure Consistent Dependency Injection
The class uses both constructor injection and field injection. cookieUtil and jwtUtil are injected via the constructor (lines 31-34) and marked as final, while userLoginRepo is injected via field injection without the final modifier (line 27). For consistency and better testability, consider using constructor injection for all dependencies and remove the @Autowired annotations from the fields.
| public ResponseEntity<String> validateJwtToken(HttpServletRequest request) { | ||
| Optional<String> jwtTokenOpt = cookieUtil.getCookieValue(request, "Jwttoken"); | ||
|
|
||
| if (jwtTokenOpt.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) | ||
| .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| String jwtToken = jwtTokenOpt.get(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Validate the token | ||
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | ||
| if (claims == null) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED).body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Invalid JWT Token!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Extract username from token | ||
| String usernameFromToken = claims.getSubject(); | ||
| if (usernameFromToken == null || usernameFromToken.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED).body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Username is missing!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Return the username if valid | ||
| return ResponseEntity.ok(usernameFromToken); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Decouple Utility Class from HTTP Response Handling
The validateJwtToken method returns a ResponseEntity<String> (line 36), which ties the utility class to the HTTP layer. Utility classes should be independent of specific frameworks or layers to promote reusability. Consider refactoring this method to throw exceptions or return a simple result object, allowing controllers or services to handle HTTP responses appropriately.
| String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); | ||
| String tokenUsername = jwtUtil.extractUsername(jwtToken); | ||
|
|
||
| // Fetch user based on userId from the database or cache | ||
| Users user = userLoginRepo.getUserByUserID(Long.parseLong(userId)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle Possible NumberFormatException When Parsing userId
Using Long.parseLong(userId) (line 75) assumes that the userId claim is always present and correctly formatted. If userId is missing or not a valid number, this will throw a NumberFormatException. Add validation to check that userId is not null and is a valid numeric string before parsing.
| logger.info("JWT token from header: " + jwtTokenFromHeader); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid Logging Sensitive Information
Logging JWT tokens from headers and cookies (lines 55-56 and 69-70) can expose sensitive information in logs, posing security risks. Remove or mask the JWT token in logs to prevent potential exposure.
Also applies to: 69-70
| package com.iemr.inventory.repo.users; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.springframework.data.jpa.repository.Query; | ||
| import org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository; | ||
| import org.springframework.data.repository.query.Param; | ||
| import org.springframework.stereotype.Repository; | ||
|
|
||
| import com.iemr.inventory.data.user.Users; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @Repository | ||
| public interface UserLoginRepo extends CrudRepository<Users, Long> { | ||
|
|
||
| @Query(" SELECT u FROM Users u WHERE u.userID = :userID AND u.deleted = false ") | ||
| public Users getUserByUserID(@Param("userID") Long userID); | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
JWT implementation appears secure with some recommendations
The JWT implementation includes essential security components but has a few areas for improvement:
- ✓ Proper token generation with HMAC-SHA256 signing
- ✓ Token expiration handling (24-hour validity)
- ✓ HttpOnly cookies for token storage
- ✓ Proper token validation filter
⚠️ Secure cookie flag is commented out⚠️ No CSRF protection found
Recommendations:
- Uncomment and enable the secure cookie flag in
CookieUtil.java:cookie.setSecure(true) - Consider implementing CSRF protection for enhanced security
- Consider reducing the token expiration time from 24 hours to a shorter duration (e.g., 8 hours)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify complete JWT implementation security
Let's verify the complete JWT implementation across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for essential JWT security components
# 1. Verify JWT token expiration implementation
echo "Checking for token expiration handling..."
rg -l "setExpiration|expiresIn|exp" --type java
# 2. Check for proper token validation
echo "Checking for token validation..."
rg -l "validateToken|verify|decode" --type java
# 3. Look for secure password hashing
echo "Checking for password security..."
rg -l "BCrypt|PasswordEncoder|encode" --type java
# 4. Check for CSRF protection
echo "Checking for CSRF protection..."
rg -l "csrf|CSRF|CsrfFilter" --type java
# 5. Verify secure cookie configuration
echo "Checking for secure cookie settings..."
rg "cookie|Cookie" --type java -A 5
Length of output: 14438
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the JWT implementation details more closely
# 1. Check JWT token generation and validation implementation
echo "Examining JWT implementation details..."
rg "class JwtUtil" -A 20 src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUtil.java
# 2. Check security configuration
echo "Checking security configuration..."
fd -e java -e properties -e yml "SecurityConfig|WebSecurityConfig|application.properties|application.yml" --exec cat {}
# 3. Examine token expiration settings
echo "Checking token expiration settings..."
rg "setExpiration|expiresIn|exp" -A 3 src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUtil.java
# 4. Check authentication filter implementation
echo "Examining authentication filter..."
rg "class.*Filter" -A 10 src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java
Length of output: 3550
| public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) { | ||
| return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies()) | ||
| .filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName())) | ||
| .map(Cookie::getValue) | ||
| .findFirst() | ||
| .orElse(null); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check to prevent NullPointerException
The method will throw NullPointerException if request.getCookies() returns null.
public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) {
+ Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies();
+ if (cookies == null) return null;
return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies())
.filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName()))
.map(Cookie::getValue)
.findFirst()
.orElse(null);
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| public void addJwtTokenToCookie(String Jwttoken, HttpServletResponse response) { | ||
| // Create a new cookie with the JWT token | ||
| Cookie cookie = new Cookie("Jwttoken", Jwttoken); | ||
| cookie.setHttpOnly(true); // Prevent JavaScript access for security | ||
| // cookie.setSecure(true); // Ensure the cookie is sent only over HTTPS | ||
| cookie.setMaxAge(60 * 60 * 24); // 1 day expiration time | ||
| cookie.setPath("/"); // Make the cookie available for the entire application | ||
| response.addCookie(cookie); // Add the cookie to the response | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical security configurations missing in cookie setup
Several security-critical configurations are missing or disabled:
- The
Secureflag is commented out, allowing cookie transmission over HTTP - Missing
SameSiteattribute, which is crucial for preventing CSRF attacks - Root path
/might be too broad, consider restricting to specific API paths
Apply these security enhancements:
public void addJwtTokenToCookie(String Jwttoken, HttpServletResponse response) {
Cookie cookie = new Cookie("Jwttoken", Jwttoken);
cookie.setHttpOnly(true); // Prevent JavaScript access for security
- // cookie.setSecure(true); // Ensure the cookie is sent only over HTTPS
+ cookie.setSecure(true); // Ensure the cookie is sent only over HTTPS
cookie.setMaxAge(60 * 60 * 24); // 1 day expiration time
- cookie.setPath("/"); // Make the cookie available for the entire application
+ cookie.setPath("/api"); // Restrict to API paths only
+ cookie.setAttribute("SameSite", "Strict"); // Prevent CSRF attacks
response.addCookie(cookie); // Add the cookie to the response
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| private String userName; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "Password") | ||
| private String password; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "AgentID") | ||
| private String agentID; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "AgentPassword") | ||
| private String agentPassword; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security concerns with password fields and PII data
- Password fields are marked with @expose, potentially exposing them in JSON serialization
- Missing validation annotations for sensitive fields
- PII data (aadhaarNo, pan, etc.) should be encrypted at rest
@Expose
@Column(name = "UserName")
private String userName;
- @Expose
+ @JsonIgnore
@Column(name = "Password")
+ @Pattern(regexp = "^(?=.*[0-9])(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z])(?=.*[@#$%^&+=])(?=\\S+$).{8,}$",
+ message = "Password must be 8 characters long and contain at least one number, one uppercase, one lowercase letter and one special character")
private String password;
@Expose
@Column(name = "AgentID")
private String agentID;
- @Expose
+ @JsonIgnore
@Column(name = "AgentPassword")
private String agentPassword;Consider implementing field encryption for PII data using JPA converters:
@Convert(converter = EncryptedStringConverter.class)
@Column(name = "AadhaarNo")
private String aadhaarNo;
pom.xml
Outdated
| <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.jsonwebtoken/jjwt-api --> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>jjwt-api</artifactId> | ||
| <version>0.11.5</version> | ||
| </dependency> | ||
| <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.jsonwebtoken/jjwt-impl --> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>jjwt-impl</artifactId> | ||
| <version>0.11.5</version> | ||
| <scope>runtime</scope> | ||
| </dependency> | ||
| <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.jsonwebtoken/jjwt-jackson --> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>jjwt-jackson</artifactId> | ||
| <version>0.11.5</version> | ||
| <scope>runtime</scope> | ||
| </dependency> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update JWT dependencies to version 0.12.6
The current version (0.11.5) is outdated. Version 0.12.6 is available and there are no known security vulnerabilities reported. Update all three JWT dependencies to maintain version consistency:
io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api:0.11.5→0.12.6io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-impl:0.11.5→0.12.6io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-jackson:0.11.5→0.12.6
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify JWT dependencies version and security advisories
The JWT dependencies are correctly configured with proper scopes, but consider updating to the latest version for security patches.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for latest versions and security advisories for JWT dependencies
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/jwtk/jjwt/releases/latest | jq -r '.tag_name'
# Check for known vulnerabilities
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: MAVEN, package: "io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}'
Length of output: 374
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/CookieUtil.java (1)
27-30:⚠️ Potential issueCritical improvements needed for JWT cookie handling
Several issues need to be addressed:
- Missing null check for cookies (as noted in previous review)
- Hard-coded cookie name should be a constant
- Consider adding security event logging
+ private static final String JWT_COOKIE_NAME = "Jwttoken"; + public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) { + if (request == null) { + return null; + } + Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); + if (cookies == null) { + return null; + } - return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies()) - .filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName())) - .map(Cookie::getValue) - .findFirst() - .orElse(null); + for (Cookie cookie : cookies) { + if (JWT_COOKIE_NAME.equals(cookie.getName())) { + return cookie.getValue(); + } + } + return null; }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/CookieUtil.java (2)
12-13: Enhance security and documentation of the utility classConsider making the class final and adding comprehensive JavaDoc documentation explaining its security implications and usage.
@Service -public class CookieUtil { +/** + * Utility class for secure cookie management, specifically handling JWT tokens. + * This class provides methods for retrieving and managing cookies in a secure manner. + */ +public final class CookieUtil {
15-25: Enhance robustness of cookie retrievalThe implementation is good with proper null handling, but consider:
- Using case-insensitive comparison for cookie names
- Adding parameter validation
public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) { + if (request == null || cookieName == null || cookieName.trim().isEmpty()) { + return Optional.empty(); + } Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); if (cookies != null) { for (Cookie cookie : cookies) { - if (cookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) { + if (cookieName.equalsIgnoreCase(cookie.getName())) { return Optional.of(cookie.getValue()); } } } return Optional.empty(); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
pom.xml(3 hunks)src/main/environment/common_ci.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_dev.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_example.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_test.properties(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/repo/users/UserLoginRepo.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/CookieUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/FilterConfig.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUtil.java(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- src/main/environment/common_ci.properties
- src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/repo/users/UserLoginRepo.java
- src/main/environment/common_example.properties
- src/main/environment/common_test.properties
- src/main/environment/common_dev.properties
- src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/FilterConfig.java
- pom.xml
- src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java
- src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java
- src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUtil.java
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/CookieUtil.java (1)
13-13: Add essential cookie management methods
The utility class is missing crucial cookie management functionality:
- Method to securely create and add JWT cookie with proper security attributes (Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite)
- Method to invalidate/clear JWT cookie during logout
Consider adding these methods:
public void addJwtTokenToCookie(String jwtToken, HttpServletResponse response) {
Cookie cookie = new Cookie(JWT_COOKIE_NAME, jwtToken);
cookie.setHttpOnly(true);
cookie.setSecure(true);
cookie.setPath("/api");
cookie.setAttribute("SameSite", "Strict");
cookie.setMaxAge(60 * 60 * 24); // 24 hours
response.addCookie(cookie);
}
public void clearJwtTokenCookie(HttpServletResponse response) {
Cookie cookie = new Cookie(JWT_COOKIE_NAME, "");
cookie.setHttpOnly(true);
cookie.setSecure(true);
cookie.setPath("/api");
cookie.setMaxAge(0);
response.addCookie(cookie);
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/config/RedisConfig.java (1)
Redis security configuration needs enhancement
The Redis configuration has minimal security settings:
- Empty password configuration (
spring.data.redis.password=)- Default Redis port (6379) is being used
- Missing SSL/TLS configuration
- Missing connection timeout settings
Please enhance the Redis security configuration by:
- Setting a strong password
- Configuring SSL/TLS if the Redis server is not in the same secure network
- Adding appropriate connection timeouts
- Consider using a non-default port
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
42-44: Verify Redis connection security settingsThe Redis connection configuration should include security settings.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Redis security configurations in application properties rg -l "spring\.data\.redis\.(password|ssl|timeout)"Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of application.properties for Redis security settings rg "spring\.data\.redis\.(password|ssl|timeout|host|port)" src/main/resources/application.propertiesLength of output: 158
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/RoleMasterApplication.java (2)
70-70: Consider using more specific generic type parametersThe method returns
RedisTemplate<String, Object>but is specifically configured forM_User. Consider changing the return type toRedisTemplate<String, M_User>for better type safety.-public RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) { +public RedisTemplate<String, M_User> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) {
69-82: Enhance Redis security and performance configurationSeveral important configurations are missing:
- SSL/TLS connection setup for secure Redis communication
- Connection pooling for better performance
- Timeout settings
Consider creating a separate
@Configurationclass for Redis with comprehensive configuration:@Configuration public class RedisConfiguration { @Value("${spring.redis.host}") private String redisHost; @Value("${spring.redis.port}") private int redisPort; @Bean public RedisConnectionFactory redisConnectionFactory() { LettuceConnectionFactory factory = new LettuceConnectionFactory(); factory.setUseSsl(true); factory.setHostName(redisHost); factory.setPort(redisPort); return factory; } @Bean public GenericObjectPoolConfig poolConfig() { GenericObjectPoolConfig poolConfig = new GenericObjectPoolConfig(); poolConfig.setMaxTotal(128); poolConfig.setMaxIdle(128); poolConfig.setMinIdle(16); return poolConfig; } }src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/config/RedisConfig.java (1)
48-61: Review Redis security configuration for sensitive user dataWhile the Redis template configuration is technically correct, storing user data in Redis requires additional security measures:
- Ensure Redis connection is secured (TLS/SSL)
- Consider implementing data encryption at rest
- Set appropriate TTL for cached user data
Consider adding the following security configurations:
@Bean public RedisTemplate<String, M_User> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) { RedisTemplate<String, M_User> template = new RedisTemplate<>(); template.setConnectionFactory(factory); // Use StringRedisSerializer for keys (userId) template.setKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer()); // Use Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer for values (Users objects) Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<M_User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(M_User.class); + // Configure ObjectMapper with encryption + ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); + serializer.setObjectMapper(mapper); template.setValueSerializer(serializer); + // Set default TTL + template.expire("*", Duration.ofHours(24)); return template; }src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/data/user/M_User.java (2)
24-24: Add serialVersionUID for Serializable classWhen implementing Serializable, it's recommended to define a serialVersionUID to maintain version control of the serialized data.
Add the following field:
+private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
42-42: Consider using more specific JSON annotationsThe class could benefit from more specific JSON annotations to control serialization behavior.
Consider adding these imports and annotations:
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty; +import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonFormat; // Add to date fields +@JsonFormat(pattern = "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss") private Timestamp DOB;src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (1)
20-101: Consider architectural improvements for better separation of concernsThe current implementation mixes authentication and caching responsibilities. Consider:
- Separating user caching into a dedicated service
- Implementing a proper caching abstraction layer
- Adding support for distributed systems (e.g., token revocation)
I recommend:
- Creating a separate
UserCacheServicefor Redis operations- Implementing a
TokenValidationServicefor JWT operations- Adding a distributed token blacklist mechanism
Would you like me to provide a detailed implementation plan for these architectural improvements?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/RoleMasterApplication.java(3 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/config/RedisConfig.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/data/user/M_User.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/RoleMasterApplication.java (3)
33-36: LGTM: Redis-related imports are appropriate
The added imports are necessary for Redis integration and correctly include the required classes for connection, template, and serialization.
69-82: Verify M_User serialization configuration
Ensure that the M_User class is properly configured for Redis serialization.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try to locate the M_User class first and check its configuration.
Let me check the specific annotations and configuration of the M_User class.
M_User class is properly configured for Redis serialization
The M_User class is correctly configured for Redis serialization with:
- Implements
Serializableinterface - Has
@JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)for flexible deserialization - Contains proper getters/setters for all fields
- Uses
@Exposeannotations for field control - Has a default no-args constructor required for serialization
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if M_User implements Serializable and has proper annotations
ast-grep --pattern 'class M_User implements Serializable {
$$$
}'
# Check for required Jackson annotations
rg -l "@JsonSerialize|@JsonDeserialize" --type java
Length of output: 123
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find M_User class file
fd -e java "M_User.java"
# Search for M_User class definition with broader pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'class M_User {
$$$
}'
# Look for any Jackson annotations in files containing M_User
rg "M_User" -A 5 -B 5 --type java
Length of output: 15079
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of M_User.java to check its configuration
cat src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/data/user/M_User.java
# Look for specific Jackson annotations in M_User.java
rg "@Json|@Expose" src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/data/user/M_User.java
Length of output: 7862
47-47: Verify JWT and Redis integration strategy
The PR objective mentions JWT implementation, but this file only contains Redis configuration. Please verify:
- How JWT tokens will be stored in Redis
- Token expiration strategy
- Integration between JWT authentication and Redis caching
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the JWT and Redis integration by examining the relevant files.
Let me check the Redis configuration and JWT authentication integration one last time.
JWT and Redis integration is properly implemented
The codebase shows a well-structured integration between JWT and Redis:
- JWT tokens store user information and are validated through
JwtUtil - Redis is configured to cache user data with
RedisTemplate<String, M_User> - Token validation checks both JWT authenticity and user presence in Redis cache
- Token expiration is set to 24 hours in
JwtUtil
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for JWT configuration and integration points
rg -l "jwt|token|auth" --type java
# Check for security configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1000
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check JWT utility implementation
cat src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUtil.java
# Check Redis configuration and token storage
rg -l "redis|cache" --type java
rg "redis" src/main/environment/common_*.properties
# Check JWT filter implementation
cat src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java
Length of output: 20961
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Redis configuration and JWT authentication integration
cat src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/config/RedisConfig.java
cat src/main/java/com/iemr/inventory/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java
Length of output: 5605
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<M_User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(M_User.class); | ||
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Configure ObjectMapper for Jackson serializer
The Jackson serializer might need additional configuration to handle complex object serialization properly.
Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<M_User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(M_User.class);
+ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
+mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY);
+mapper.enableDefaultTyping(ObjectMapper.DefaultTyping.NON_FINAL);
+serializer.setObjectMapper(mapper);
template.setValueSerializer(serializer);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<M_User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(M_User.class); | |
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); | |
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<M_User> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(M_User.class); | |
| ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); | |
| mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY); | |
| mapper.enableDefaultTyping(ObjectMapper.DefaultTyping.NON_FINAL); | |
| serializer.setObjectMapper(mapper); | |
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); |
| @JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true) | ||
| public class M_User implements Serializable { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Protect sensitive data from serialization
The class contains sensitive user data (PAN, Aadhaar, Password) that should be protected during serialization.
Add the following annotations to protect sensitive fields:
@Entity
@Table(name = "M_User")
@JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
+@JsonIgnoreProperties(value = {"password"}, allowSetters = true)
public class M_User implements Serializable {Also add @JsonIgnore to sensitive fields:
private String AadhaarNo;
private String PAN;
-private String Password;
+@JsonIgnore
+private String Password;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @Autowired | ||
| private CookieUtil cookieUtil; | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private JwtUtil jwtUtil; | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; | ||
| private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); | ||
|
|
||
| public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil) { | ||
| this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; | ||
| this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null checks and final modifiers for dependencies
While the inconsistent dependency injection was previously noted, there are additional concerns:
- Missing null checks in the constructor for
cookieUtilandjwtUtil - Field-injected dependencies (
userLoginRepoandredisTemplate) should be marked asfinal
Apply this diff:
@Component
public class JwtAuthenticationUtil {
@Autowired
- private CookieUtil cookieUtil;
+ private final CookieUtil cookieUtil;
@Autowired
- private JwtUtil jwtUtil;
+ private final JwtUtil jwtUtil;
@Autowired
- private UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo;
+ private final UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo;
@Autowired
- private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate;
+ private final RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate;
private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName());
public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil,
+ UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo, RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate) {
+ if (cookieUtil == null || jwtUtil == null || userLoginRepo == null || redisTemplate == null) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Dependencies cannot be null");
+ }
this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil;
this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil;
+ this.userLoginRepo = userLoginRepo;
+ this.redisTemplate = redisTemplate;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Autowired | |
| private CookieUtil cookieUtil; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private JwtUtil jwtUtil; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; | |
| private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); | |
| public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil) { | |
| this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; | |
| this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; | |
| } | |
| @Autowired | |
| private final CookieUtil cookieUtil; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private final JwtUtil jwtUtil; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private final UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; | |
| @Autowired | |
| private final RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; | |
| private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass().getName()); | |
| public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil, | |
| UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo, RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate) { | |
| if (cookieUtil == null || jwtUtil == null || userLoginRepo == null || redisTemplate == null) { | |
| throw new IllegalArgumentException("Dependencies cannot be null"); | |
| } | |
| this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; | |
| this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; | |
| this.userLoginRepo = userLoginRepo; | |
| this.redisTemplate = redisTemplate; | |
| } |
| public ResponseEntity<String> validateJwtToken(HttpServletRequest request) { | ||
| Optional<String> jwtTokenOpt = cookieUtil.getCookieValue(request, "Jwttoken"); | ||
|
|
||
| if (jwtTokenOpt.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) | ||
| .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| String jwtToken = jwtTokenOpt.get(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Validate the token | ||
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | ||
| if (claims == null) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED).body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Invalid JWT Token!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Extract username from token | ||
| String usernameFromToken = claims.getSubject(); | ||
| if (usernameFromToken == null || usernameFromToken.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) | ||
| .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Username is missing!"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Return the username if valid | ||
| return ResponseEntity.ok(usernameFromToken); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance security measures in token validation
The token validation could be strengthened with additional security measures:
- Add logging for validation failures
- Implement more thorough claims validation
- Consider rate limiting for failed attempts
Apply this diff:
public ResponseEntity<String> validateJwtToken(HttpServletRequest request) {
Optional<String> jwtTokenOpt = cookieUtil.getCookieValue(request, "Jwttoken");
if (jwtTokenOpt.isEmpty()) {
+ logger.warn("JWT token not found in request cookies");
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED)
.body("Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!");
}
String jwtToken = jwtTokenOpt.get();
// Validate the token
Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken);
if (claims == null) {
+ logger.warn("Invalid JWT token detected");
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED).body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Invalid JWT Token!");
}
+ // Validate additional claims
+ if (!validateMandatoryClaims(claims)) {
+ logger.warn("Missing mandatory claims in JWT token");
+ return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED).body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Invalid token claims!");
+ }
// Extract username from token
String usernameFromToken = claims.getSubject();
if (usernameFromToken == null || usernameFromToken.isEmpty()) {
+ logger.warn("Username missing in JWT token");
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED)
.body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Username is missing!");
}
+ logger.debug("JWT token validated successfully for user: {}", usernameFromToken);
// Return the username if valid
return ResponseEntity.ok(usernameFromToken);
}
+private boolean validateMandatoryClaims(Claims claims) {
+ return claims.getExpiration() != null &&
+ claims.getIssuedAt() != null &&
+ claims.get("userId") != null;
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| private M_User getUserFromCache(String userId) { | ||
| String redisKey = "user_" + userId; // The Redis key format | ||
| M_User user = (M_User) redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey); | ||
|
|
||
| if (user == null) { | ||
| logger.warn("User not found in Redis."); | ||
| } else { | ||
| logger.info("User fetched successfully from Redis."); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return user; // Returns null if not found | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Secure Redis key management and improve caching strategy
The current Redis implementation has several concerns:
- Vulnerable to key injection due to direct string concatenation
- Missing key namespace/prefix strategy
- No cache TTL management
Apply this diff:
+private static final String REDIS_USER_KEY_PREFIX = "inventory:user:";
+private static final long REDIS_USER_TTL = 3600; // 1 hour in seconds
private M_User getUserFromCache(String userId) {
- String redisKey = "user_" + userId; // The Redis key format
+ if (userId == null || !userId.matches("^[0-9]+$")) {
+ logger.warn("Invalid userId format attempted");
+ return null;
+ }
+
+ String redisKey = REDIS_USER_KEY_PREFIX + userId;
M_User user = (M_User) redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey);
if (user == null) {
- logger.warn("User not found in Redis.");
+ logger.debug("Cache miss for userId: {}", userId);
+ // Attempt to load from database and cache
+ Optional<M_User> dbUser = userLoginRepo.findById(Long.parseLong(userId));
+ if (dbUser.isPresent()) {
+ user = dbUser.get();
+ redisTemplate.opsForValue().set(redisKey, user, REDIS_USER_TTL, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
+ logger.debug("User cached from database for userId: {}", userId);
+ } else {
+ logger.warn("User not found in database for userId: {}", userId);
+ }
} else {
- logger.info("User fetched successfully from Redis.");
+ logger.debug("Cache hit for userId: {}", userId);
}
return user; // Returns null if not found
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private M_User getUserFromCache(String userId) { | |
| String redisKey = "user_" + userId; // The Redis key format | |
| M_User user = (M_User) redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey); | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| logger.warn("User not found in Redis."); | |
| } else { | |
| logger.info("User fetched successfully from Redis."); | |
| } | |
| return user; // Returns null if not found | |
| } | |
| private static final String REDIS_USER_KEY_PREFIX = "inventory:user:"; | |
| private static final long REDIS_USER_TTL = 3600; // 1 hour in seconds | |
| private M_User getUserFromCache(String userId) { | |
| if (userId == null || !userId.matches("^[0-9]+$")) { | |
| logger.warn("Invalid userId format attempted"); | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| String redisKey = REDIS_USER_KEY_PREFIX + userId; | |
| M_User user = (M_User) redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(redisKey); | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| logger.debug("Cache miss for userId: {}", userId); | |
| // Attempt to load from database and cache | |
| Optional<M_User> dbUser = userLoginRepo.findById(Long.parseLong(userId)); | |
| if (dbUser.isPresent()) { | |
| user = dbUser.get(); | |
| redisTemplate.opsForValue().set(redisKey, user, REDIS_USER_TTL, TimeUnit.SECONDS); | |
| logger.debug("User cached from database for userId: {}", userId); | |
| } else { | |
| logger.warn("User not found in database for userId: {}", userId); | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| logger.debug("Cache hit for userId: {}", userId); | |
| } | |
| return user; // Returns null if not found | |
| } |
| public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws IEMRException { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Validate JWT token and extract claims | ||
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | ||
|
|
||
| if (claims == null) { | ||
| throw new IEMRException("Invalid JWT token."); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); | ||
|
|
||
| // Check if user data is present in Redis | ||
| M_User user = getUserFromCache(userId); | ||
| if (user == null) { | ||
| throw new IEMRException("Invalid User ID."); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true; // Valid userId and JWT token | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { | ||
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | ||
| throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve token validation and error handling
The current implementation has several security concerns:
- Broad exception handling masks specific security issues
- Missing token expiration validation
- No validation of token signature algorithm
Apply this diff:
public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws IEMRException {
try {
+ if (jwtToken == null || jwtToken.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ throw new IEMRException("JWT token cannot be null or empty");
+ }
+
// Validate JWT token and extract claims
Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken);
if (claims == null) {
+ logger.warn("JWT token validation failed");
throw new IEMRException("Invalid JWT token.");
}
+ // Validate token expiration
+ if (claims.getExpiration() == null || claims.getExpiration().before(new Date())) {
+ logger.warn("JWT token has expired");
+ throw new IEMRException("Token has expired");
+ }
+
String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class);
+ if (userId == null || userId.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ logger.warn("userId claim is missing or empty");
+ throw new IEMRException("Invalid token: missing userId claim");
+ }
// Check if user data is present in Redis
M_User user = getUserFromCache(userId);
if (user == null) {
+ logger.warn("User not found in cache for userId: {}", userId);
throw new IEMRException("Invalid User ID.");
}
+ logger.debug("Token validation successful for userId: {}", userId);
return true; // Valid userId and JWT token
+ } catch (IEMRException e) {
+ throw e;
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e);
- throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e);
+ throw new IEMRException("Token validation error", e);
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws IEMRException { | |
| try { | |
| // Validate JWT token and extract claims | |
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | |
| if (claims == null) { | |
| throw new IEMRException("Invalid JWT token."); | |
| } | |
| String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); | |
| // Check if user data is present in Redis | |
| M_User user = getUserFromCache(userId); | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| throw new IEMRException("Invalid User ID."); | |
| } | |
| return true; // Valid userId and JWT token | |
| } catch (Exception e) { | |
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| public boolean validateUserIdAndJwtToken(String jwtToken) throws IEMRException { | |
| try { | |
| if (jwtToken == null || jwtToken.trim().isEmpty()) { | |
| throw new IEMRException("JWT token cannot be null or empty"); | |
| } | |
| // Validate JWT token and extract claims | |
| Claims claims = jwtUtil.validateToken(jwtToken); | |
| if (claims == null) { | |
| logger.warn("JWT token validation failed"); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Invalid JWT token."); | |
| } | |
| // Validate token expiration | |
| if (claims.getExpiration() == null || claims.getExpiration().before(new Date())) { | |
| logger.warn("JWT token has expired"); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Token has expired"); | |
| } | |
| String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); | |
| if (userId == null || userId.trim().isEmpty()) { | |
| logger.warn("userId claim is missing or empty"); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Invalid token: missing userId claim"); | |
| } | |
| // Check if user data is present in Redis | |
| M_User user = getUserFromCache(userId); | |
| if (user == null) { | |
| logger.warn("User not found in cache for userId: {}", userId); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Invalid User ID."); | |
| } | |
| logger.debug("Token validation successful for userId: {}", userId); | |
| return true; // Valid userId and JWT token | |
| } catch (IEMRException e) { | |
| throw e; | |
| } catch (Exception e) { | |
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Token validation error", e); | |
| } | |
| } |
|
📋 Description
JIRA ID:
Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.
✅ Type of Change
ℹ️ Additional Information
Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores