Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New mkfw implementation, with many additional features. #24

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: esp-idf-v3.2
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KorKozan
Copy link

This is a drop in replacement for mkfw, with a ton of new features and improvements:

  • help/documentation
  • parameter validation
  • error checking and error reporting via messages and return codes
  • symbolic names for some of the parameters (auto, app, data, ota_, ...)
  • numeric values can be specified in either decimal notation or hex notation
  • size values can be specified using k/K or m/M suffixes to denote KB or MB
  • automatically calculated partition sizes based on the actual sizes
  • quiet mode
  • versioning
  • no memory allocations and proper cleanup
  • fixed potential endianness problems on big endian hosts
  • proper Makefile, with release and debug targets
  • dual license: Public Domain and Zero Clause BSD (PD-like)

This is a drop in replacement for mkfw, with a ton of new features and improvements:
* help/documentation
* parameter validation
* error checking and error reporting via messages and return codes
* symbolic names for some of the parameters (auto, app, data, ota_, ...)
* numeric values can be specified in either decimal notation or hex notation
* size values can be specified using k/K or m/M suffixes to denote KB or MB
* automatically calculated partition sizes based on the actual sizes
* quiet mode
* versioning
* no memory allocations and proper cleanup
* fixed potential endianness problems on big endian hosts
* proper Makefile, with release and debug targets
* dual license: Public Domain and Zero Clause BSD (PD-like)
@rzr
Copy link

rzr commented Sep 7, 2020

is relicensing a problem ?

@KorKozan
Copy link
Author

is relicensing a problem ?

No.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants