Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade @openzeppelin/contracts from 4.8.1 to 4.9.5 #62

Closed

Conversation

carlosfkrause
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @openzeppelin/contracts from 4.8.1 to 4.9.5.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 10 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 2 months ago, on 2023-12-08.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Incorrect Calculation
SNYK-JS-OPENZEPPELINCONTRACTS-3339525
479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
No Known Exploit
Incorrect Calculation
SNYK-JS-OPENZEPPELINCONTRACTS-3339527
479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
No Known Exploit
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-OPENZEPPELINCONTRACTS-5425051
479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
No Known Exploit
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-OPENZEPPELINCONTRACTS-5711902
479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
No Known Exploit
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
SNYK-JS-OPENZEPPELINCONTRACTS-5838352
479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
No Known Exploit
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-OPENZEPPELINCONTRACTS-5425827
479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
No Known Exploit
Missing Authorization
SNYK-JS-OPENZEPPELINCONTRACTS-5672116
479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Release notes
Package name: @openzeppelin/contracts
  • 4.9.5 - 2023-12-08
    • Multicall: Patch duplicated Address.functionDelegateCall.
  • 4.9.4 - 2023-12-07
    • ERC2771Context and Context: Introduce a _contextPrefixLength() getter, used to trim extra information appended to msg.data.
    • Multicall: Make aware of non-canonical context (i.e. msg.sender is not _msgSender()), allowing compatibility with ERC2771Context.
  • 4.9.3 - 2023-07-28

    Note
    This release contains a fix for GHSA-g4vp-m682-qqmp.

    • ERC2771Context: Return the forwarder address whenever the msg.data of a call originating from a trusted forwarder is not long enough to contain the request signer address (i.e. msg.data.length is less than 20 bytes), as specified by ERC-2771. (#4481)
    • ERC2771Context: Prevent revert in _msgData() when a call originating from a trusted forwarder is not long enough to contain the request signer address (i.e. msg.data.length is less than 20 bytes). Return the full calldata in that case. (#4484)
  • 4.9.2 - 2023-06-16

    Note
    This release contains a fix for GHSA-wprv-93r4-jj2p.

    • MerkleProof: Fix a bug in processMultiProof and processMultiProofCalldata that allows proving arbitrary leaves if the tree contains a node with value 0 at depth 1.
  • 4.9.1 - 2023-06-07

    Note
    This release contains a fix for GHSA-5h3x-9wvq-w4m2.

    • Governor: Add a mechanism to restrict the address of the proposer using a suffix in the description.
  • 4.9.0 - 2023-05-23
  • 4.9.0-rc.1 - 2023-05-17
  • 4.9.0-rc.0 - 2023-05-09
  • 4.8.3 - 2023-04-13
  • 4.8.2 - 2023-03-02
  • 4.8.1 - 2023-01-13
from @openzeppelin/contracts GitHub release notes

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@ernestognw
Copy link
Member

Closing after #60 was merged

@ernestognw ernestognw closed this Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants