Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EJB and Web JaccService to not be immediate=true #30629

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

jhanders34
Copy link
Member

  • When restructuring the JaccServiceImpl code the EJB and Web versions were made immediate=true when the original JaccServiceImpl was not which causes some side effects where things were initialized in the wrong order. This change fixes it.

This PR fixes a regression caused by the changes in PR #30293.

- When restructuring the JaccServiceImpl code the EJB and Web versions
were made immediate=true when the original JaccServiceImpl was not which
causes some side effects where things were initialized in the wrong
order.  This change fixes it.
@jhanders34
Copy link
Member Author

jhanders34 commented Jan 23, 2025

!build (view Open Liberty Personal Build - ✅ completed successfully!)

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@jhanders34
Copy link
Member Author

jhanders34 commented Jan 23, 2025

!build
(view Open Liberty Personal Build - ✅ completed successfully!)
global.java2.sec=true

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 2 product code files were changed.
  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

1 similar comment
@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 2 product code files were changed.
  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

@jhanders34 jhanders34 merged commit fea7053 into OpenLiberty:integration Jan 24, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants