-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tool: rewrite suricatasc and suricatactl in rust - v9 #12504
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This is a re-implementation of suricatasc program in Rust that attempts to be a 100% drop-in replacement.
As we have 2 Windows builds, do one using the release-style distribution file.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12504 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.56% 80.58% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 925 926 +1
Lines 259292 259295 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 208906 208946 +40
+ Misses 50386 50349 -37
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Information: QA ran without warnings. Pipeline 24441 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noice! :)
- CI failures look legit to me.
- Seems like we need doc update on usage of these tools.
The RPM builds? Unfortunately those can only be fixed after merge. |
Thanks. Missed that. Most users don't need to know what these tools are written in, just how to use them :) |
Continuation of #9817.
Replaces suricatasc and suricatactl with Rust variants removing python from our
distributed code (except suricata-update).
These now pass CI as some CI tests now use suricatasc where they didn't in the
previous version.
These should also be pure drop-in replacements.
Usually rewrites are a bad idea, but these are small, and in our core language
set, and may inspire us to write new more interesting tooling in the future :)
Ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6287