-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[9.0] [WIP] quality_control_stock #238
Conversation
…README files, and new concepts. WIP of quality_control_tolerance
* File missing * Triggers for product category
* Omit lot when it's not present * Change icon set
* Added "partner_selectable" field, so that inspections can by made by partner * Stock inspections are "partner_selectable" * Little view fixing, field was oe_edit_only instead of label * Added partner to creation from stock_picking * Added tests * Picking pack operations automatically created
* more tests to increase coveralls
* added demo data * replaced unlink method by ondelete="cascade" * required changes
Making it a regular field, you can put any manual quantity in inspections
quality_control_mrp: tests extended
…, change openerp for odoo and remove data tag.
….multi, fix references on views.
@damendieta please squash all the consecutive transifex commits together to smash a little bit the history. |
Hi @lreficent I was thinking about to squash all commits before merge to have only one big commit for the module, that's why I havent's done that in this few commits. Do you think it's necessary to do this in this state of the PR? can we wait to do it before the merge? |
@damendieta yes, it is preferable, because we want to always keep the history and the previous contributions to a module, if we squash everything into one big commit we'll lose all previous contributions which wouldn't be fair for them. In the other hand, it is also good to keep history as small as possible, so that's why transifex commits can be squashed (as they are automatic translation commits) and (right before merging and after all possible reviews are attended) to squash all your commit of the migration. |
@lreficent of course I was referring to squash all my commits, not all on the PR, that's why I took the work of keeping the history, even in the ones merged from odoo-mrp, it's important to respect everyones job. I squashed the commits and I'll squash subsequents commit to have only one commit for all required changes for this PR. Daniel. |
@lreficent wich is the correct way to squash the changes for the OCA, I've tried several alternatives but all the time I get an undesired result. You can see this: It has added my name to all previous commits, I think this is because it was on another repo, but I don't think it's ok. Could you please instruct me with the standard OCA way to squash commits. Thanks. |
Hi @damendieta I'll point you this comment of another member of the OCA which is perfectly detailed and explained. Let me know if you have any issue. |
This is a work in progress, the module is functional but no test had been added.
Depends on: