Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MIG] stock_picking_invoicing_incoterm: Migration to 14.0 #1618

Merged

Conversation

dreispt
Copy link
Member

@dreispt dreispt commented Nov 26, 2023

Closes #828

tafaRU and others added 7 commits November 26, 2023 14:35
squash Transbot updated translations from Transifex
OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex
OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex

OCA Transbot updated translations from Transifex
@dreispt dreispt force-pushed the fredzamoabg-14.0-mig-stock_picking_invoicing_incoterm branch from 8af4aec to f9b090d Compare November 26, 2023 15:50
@dreispt
Copy link
Member Author

dreispt commented Nov 26, 2023

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1618-by-dreispt-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit e2bb3fa into 14.0 Nov 26, 2023
8 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 651f73e. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot deleted the fredzamoabg-14.0-mig-stock_picking_invoicing_incoterm branch November 26, 2023 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants