Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto-cpufreq: 1.9.9 > 2.1.0 #269712

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

liberodark
Copy link
Contributor

@liberodark liberodark commented Nov 24, 2023

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Priorities

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@liberodark
Copy link
Contributor Author

liberodark commented Nov 24, 2023

Hi, @Technical27 if you want to help on this PR ?

Best Regards

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from Technical27 November 24, 2023 22:31
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Nov 24, 2023
@MikaelFangel
Copy link
Contributor

Note, there is a PR from 1.9.9 -> 2.0.0 (#258684)

@deviantsemicolon
Copy link
Contributor

are there any plans to actually merge this?

@fpletz
Copy link
Member

fpletz commented Jan 10, 2024

No hash update. This is probably useless.

@fpletz fpletz closed this Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants