-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed an issue in Surface splitSurfaceForSubSurfaces which caused the… #4431
Conversation
…w routine to return way too may overlapping surfaces Added a unit test Issue_4374 which uses one surface from the secondary school ref building as test dats
@ggartside This is great as this is an important fix. @DavidGoldwasser Would you be able to use one of the installers to verify this fixes the problem? |
Still some issues, see my updates on this issue in measure repo. |
@ggartside ok, so I think we are good with what was in this installer without the new proposed change to change where the split happens. This was misunderstanding on my part. I didn't realize it splits between all sub-surfaces instead of just doors. Here are my proposed fixes to the measure. One removes windows before splitting so it only splits at doors. The other is change in tolerance on rectangle check. NREL/openstudio-model-articulation-gem@3769173 |
@ggartside and @tijcolem minor correction to my last comment. I'm using ins taller from a few days ago, I'm wondering if the last commit from today should be removed? or maybe it won't create any problems. I'm concerned that when I do clear out windows before split that the new split won't be tight against the door as is expected. |
@ggartside Sounds like @DavidGoldwasser was able to successfully use your split surface fix ending on commit |
@DavidGoldwasser If the intention is to only split the surface around doors then I could modify the original routine to skip window openings. @tijcolem I will revert back to the original method, One thing I don't understand yet is why this routine is necessary, maybe you can enlighten me? |
Task linked: CU-1h1w527 Review Surface matching PR (03) |
CI Results for e732db8:
|
@ggartside Thanks for reverting! This looks good and I'll drop in. |
…w routine to return way too may overlapping surfaces
Added a unit test Issue_4374 which uses one surface from the secondary school ref building as test dats
Pull request overview
Pull Request Author
src/model/test
)src/energyplus/Test
)src/osversion/VersionTranslator.cpp
)Labels:
IDDChange
APIChange
Pull Request - Ready for CI
so that CI builds your PRReview Checklist
This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.