Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

fetch initial recordings and render app using initial state #98

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

bkd705
Copy link
Contributor

@bkd705 bkd705 commented Jul 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling and logging for recording retrieval.
    • Integrated sorting and local storage of recordings.
    • Added initial state management for recordings in the ContentApp.
  • Improvements

    • Asynchronous handling and better response management for fetching recordings.
    • Custom callback support in the sendMessage function for handling responses.
  • Refactor

    • Refined AppStateProvider to use initial recordings from props.
    • Updated ContentApp and content.tsx to support initial state data.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@bkd705 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fbc9c9c and 8db240c.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the Mocksi-Lite application introduced several enhancements, focusing on the getRecordings function and its error handling, improved API response management, and better integration and initialization of the application state. These changes primarily aim to streamline data fetching, enhance error handling, and ensure the UI initializes with the correct state data.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../background.ts Enhanced getRecordings to return a Promise resolving to an array of Recording objects, improved error handling, added sorting and local storage of recordings, and updated message listener to handle the returned promise effectively.
.../ContentApp.tsx Added new import for Recording, modified ContentProps with an optional initialState property, and updated ContentApp function to destructure and utilize this new property.
.../utils.ts Updated sendMessage function to include an optional callback parameter for custom handling of the response from chrome.runtime.sendMessage.
.../content.tsx Imported Recording and refactored sendMessage call to include a callback for handling the response and updating ContentApp with the initial state data.
.../AppStateContext.tsx Updated AppStateProvider to accept an optional initialRecordings prop and modified useEffect hook to utilize this prop instead of directly accessing result.recordings.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant ContentApp
    participant Background
    participant ChromeRuntime

    ContentApp ->> ChromeRuntime: sendMessage("getRecordings")
    ChromeRuntime ->> Background: onMessage("getRecordings")
    Background ->> Background: getRecordings()
    Background ->> ChromeRuntime: Response with recordings
    ChromeRuntime ->> ContentApp: Response with recordings
    ContentApp ->> AppStateProvider: Initialize with recordings
Loading

Poem

In the world of code where bytes do flow,
Updates bring a smoother show.
Recordings fetched with careful grace,
Errors handled, in their place.
Initial states now set the scene,
Mocksi-Lite, a coder's dream.

~ 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (1)

Line range hint 215-225: Enhanced sendMessage function with callback

The addition of an optional callback parameter in sendMessage is a good enhancement, allowing for custom handling of responses. The default empty function ensures that existing calls to sendMessage without a callback continue to work without modification. However, the error handling inside the callback could be improved to ensure that errors are not just logged but also handled appropriately.

- console.error("Error sending message to background script:", error);
- logout();
+ if (error instanceof Error) {
+   console.error("Error sending message to background script:", error.message);
+   logout();
+ } else {
+   console.error("Error sending message to background script: Unknown error");
+   logout();
+ }
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9eca730 and 914680b.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur
PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80
File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93
Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z
Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.
Additional comments not posted (5)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (3)

3-3: Import of Recording type is correctly added.

This import is necessary for the new functionality in ContentApp, aligning with the changes in the interface and component props.


27-29: Updated ContentProps interface to include initialState.

The addition of initialState as an optional property is well-implemented, using TypeScript's optional typing to ensure backward compatibility and flexibility.


117-121: Updated function signature for ContentApp is correctly implemented.

The inclusion of initialState in the function signature aligns with the interface changes and the PR's objectives to handle recordings data effectively.

Verification successful

Updated function signature for ContentApp is correctly implemented.

The inclusion of initialState in the function signature aligns with the interface changes and the PR's objectives to handle recordings data effectively. The initialState is correctly utilized within the ContentApp component.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `initialState` is used correctly within the `ContentApp` component.

# Test: Search for the usage of `initialState` inside `ContentApp`.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'initialState'

Length of output: 75


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `initialState` is used correctly within the `ContentApp` component.

# Test: Search for the usage of `initialState` inside `ContentApp`.
rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' -t tsx -A 5 'initialState'

Length of output: 1150

apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (1)

2-2: Import statement for Recording type

The import statement for Recording from "../background" is correct and necessary for type-checking the recordings array in the callback function. This ensures that the recordings data used in the app component is correctly typed, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity across the application.

apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)

517-531: Handling of getRecordings promise in message listener

The update to handle the promise returned by getRecordings in the message listener is implemented correctly. It properly handles both the success and error cases, ensuring that the client receives the appropriate response. This is crucial for maintaining robust communication between the background script and the content scripts or popup scripts.

Comment on lines 84 to 95
sendMessage("getRecordings", {}, (response) => {
console.log("recordings: ", response.recordings);
root.render(
<ContentApp
isOpen={true}
email={email || ""}
initialState={{
recordings: response.recordings as Recording[],
}}
/>,
);
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor sendMessage callback for error handling

While the callback function correctly handles the response and updates the rendering of ContentApp, there is no error handling if response.recordings is undefined or null. This could potentially lead to runtime errors when attempting to access properties on undefined.

- console.log("recordings: ", response.recordings);
- root.render(
-   <ContentApp
-     isOpen={true}
-     email={email || ""}
-     initialState={{
-       recordings: response.recordings as Recording[],
-     }}
-   />,
- );
+ if (response && response.recordings) {
+   console.log("recordings: ", response.recordings);
+   root.render(
+     <ContentApp
+       isOpen={true}
+       email={email || ""}
+       initialState={{
+         recordings: response.recordings as Recording[],
+       }}
+     />,
+   );
+ } else {
+   console.error("Failed to load recordings: ", response);
+ }
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
sendMessage("getRecordings", {}, (response) => {
console.log("recordings: ", response.recordings);
root.render(
<ContentApp
isOpen={true}
email={email || ""}
initialState={{
recordings: response.recordings as Recording[],
}}
/>,
);
});
sendMessage("getRecordings", {}, (response) => {
if (response && response.recordings) {
console.log("recordings: ", response.recordings);
root.render(
<ContentApp
isOpen={true}
email={email || ""}
initialState={{
recordings: response.recordings as Recording[],
}}
/>,
);
} else {
console.error("Failed to load recordings: ", response);
}
});

Comment on lines +304 to +333
async function getRecordings(): Promise<Recording[]> {
const email = await getEmail();

if (email) {
if (!email) {
console.error("Email not found. Cannot fetch recordings.");
return [];
}

try {
const response = await apiCall(
`recordings?creator=${encodeURIComponent(email)}`,
).catch((err) => {
console.error(`Failed to fetch recordings: ${err}`);
return null;
});
);

if (!response || response.length === 0) {
console.error("No recordings found or failed to fetch recordings.");
chrome.storage.local.set({ recordings: "[]" });
return;
return [];
}

const sorted = response.sort((a: Recording, b: Recording) =>
a.updated_timestamp > b.updated_timestamp ? -1 : 0,
);

const recordings = JSON.stringify(sorted) || "[]";
chrome.storage.local.set({ recordings });
} else {
console.error("Email not found. Cannot fetch recordings.");

return sorted;
} catch (err) {
console.error(`Failed to fetch recordings: ${err}`);
return [];
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactored getRecordings function

The refactoring of getRecordings to include better error handling and sorting is a positive change. However, the error handling could be further improved by providing more specific error messages and possibly retry mechanisms or fallbacks when fetching recordings fails.

- console.error("Email not found. Cannot fetch recordings.");
- console.error("No recordings found or failed to fetch recordings.");
- console.error(`Failed to fetch recordings: ${err}`);
+ console.error("Email not found. Cannot fetch recordings. Please ensure the user is logged in.");
+ console.error("No recordings found or failed to fetch recordings. Checking connectivity might help.");
+ console.error(`Failed to fetch recordings due to: ${err.message}. Retrying might resolve the issue.`);
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async function getRecordings(): Promise<Recording[]> {
const email = await getEmail();
if (email) {
if (!email) {
console.error("Email not found. Cannot fetch recordings.");
return [];
}
try {
const response = await apiCall(
`recordings?creator=${encodeURIComponent(email)}`,
).catch((err) => {
console.error(`Failed to fetch recordings: ${err}`);
return null;
});
);
if (!response || response.length === 0) {
console.error("No recordings found or failed to fetch recordings.");
chrome.storage.local.set({ recordings: "[]" });
return;
return [];
}
const sorted = response.sort((a: Recording, b: Recording) =>
a.updated_timestamp > b.updated_timestamp ? -1 : 0,
);
const recordings = JSON.stringify(sorted) || "[]";
chrome.storage.local.set({ recordings });
} else {
console.error("Email not found. Cannot fetch recordings.");
return sorted;
} catch (err) {
console.error(`Failed to fetch recordings: ${err}`);
return [];
async function getRecordings(): Promise<Recording[]> {
const email = await getEmail();
if (!email) {
console.error("Email not found. Cannot fetch recordings. Please ensure the user is logged in.");
return [];
}
try {
const response = await apiCall(
`recordings?creator=${encodeURIComponent(email)}`,
);
if (!response || response.length === 0) {
console.error("No recordings found or failed to fetch recordings. Checking connectivity might help.");
chrome.storage.local.set({ recordings: "[]" });
return [];
}
const sorted = response.sort((a: Recording, b: Recording) =>
a.updated_timestamp > b.updated_timestamp ? -1 : 0,
);
const recordings = JSON.stringify(sorted) || "[]";
chrome.storage.local.set({ recordings });
return sorted;
} catch (err) {
console.error(`Failed to fetch recordings due to: ${err.message}. Retrying might resolve the issue.`);
return [];
}
}

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 914680b and fbc9c9c.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx (1)

109-109: Updated component signature to accept initialRecordings.

The addition of initialRecordings as an optional prop to AppStateProvider is correctly implemented and aligns with TypeScript best practices for optional props.

children,
initialRecordings,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using a more robust method for URL checks in single-page applications to handle client-side routing scenarios better.

The following instances of window.location.href were found:

  • apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx: Line 111
  • apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx: Line 14

Using window.location.href might not always reflect the desired URL in cases of client-side routing (e.g., in single-page applications). Consider using a more robust method to determine the current URL or state, such as the React Router's useLocation hook.

Analysis chain

Review the updated useEffect logic for handling initialRecordings.

  1. Correctness: The logic checks if initialRecordings has any recordings for the current URL and sets the state accordingly. This is a sensible approach to initializing the state based on context-specific data.
  2. Performance: The use of optional chaining (?.) and some() method is efficient for this use case. However, ensure that chrome.storage.local.get is not causing excessive delays or performance issues, especially on initial load.
  3. Best Practices: The dependency array of useEffect correctly includes initialRecordings, ensuring that the effect re-runs only when initialRecordings changes.
  4. Potential Issue: There is a reliance on window.location.href which might not always reflect the desired URL in cases of client-side routing (e.g., in single-page applications). Consider using a more robust method to determine the current URL or state.

Consider using a more robust method for URL checks in single-page applications to handle client-side routing scenarios better.

Also applies to: 119-145

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for alternative URL handling in client-side routing scenarios.

# Test: Search for usage of `window.location.href` and suggest alternatives if found.
rg --type typescript "window.location.href"

Length of output: 78


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for alternative URL handling in client-side routing scenarios.

# Test: Search for usage of `window.location.href` and suggest alternatives if found.
rg "window.location.href" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"

Length of output: 267

@bkd705 bkd705 merged commit 6b0c2cc into main Jul 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@bkd705 bkd705 deleted the bd-initial-recordings branch July 18, 2024 18:12
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants