[NC]: Get updated storage recordings fix #54
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates to the mocksi-lite application enhance the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant U as User
participant CD as CreateDemo Component
participant LS as Local Storage
Note over CD: Initial Rendering
U->>+CD: Access CreateDemo
CD->>+LS: Call getRecordings()
LS-->>-CD: Return recordings data
CD->>-CD: Update state with recordings
Note over CD: Conditionally Update UI
Poem
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
nicolaschapur
changed the title
|
|
||
| const getRecordings = async () => { | ||
| const results = await chrome.storage.local.get(["recordings"]); | ||
| const newRecordings = JSON.parse(results.recordings); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you add a try/catch here?
| @@ -18,11 +18,23 @@ const CreateDemo = ({ | |||
| setState, | |||
| }: CreateDemoProps) => { | |||
| const [recordings, setRecordings] = useState<Recording[]>([]); | |||
|
|
|||
| const getRecordings = async () => { | |||
| const results = await chrome.storage.local.get(["recordings"]); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you make sure if results is empty, results gets set to "{}"?
Something like:
const results:string = await .... || "{}"![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/index.tsx (1)
36-36: Ensure proper use of custom lint directives.The custom lint directive
biome-ignore lint/correctness/useExhaustiveDependencies:is used. If this is intentional and justified, ensure documentation or comments explain why this exception is necessary.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/DemoItem.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/DemoItem.tsx
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/index.tsx (2)
36-41: Verify useEffect dependencies and conditional logic.The
useEffecthook usescreateFormas a dependency and callsgetRecordingswhencreateFormis false. Ensure this logic aligns with the intended behavior and that all necessary dependencies are included.
41-41: Logic for handling thecreateFormstate appears sound.The handling of
createFormto conditionally render components or set state seems appropriate and follows typical React patterns.
| if (newRecordings.length === recordings.length) { | ||
| getRecordings(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| setRecordings(newRecordings); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Recursive call in getRecordings may lead to stack overflow.
The recursive call to getRecordings inside itself (when the length of newRecordings equals recordings) could potentially lead to a stack overflow if the condition is met repeatedly. Consider a different approach to handle updates or use a loop instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with the rabbit here, are there other options we could explore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@elg0nz, considering the potential issue with the current recursive approach in getRecordings, here's an alternative using a while loop that avoids recursion and controls the update check more safely:
const getRecordings = async () => {
let continueFetching = true;
while (continueFetching) {
try {
const results = await chrome.storage.local.get(["recordings"]);
const newRecordings = JSON.parse(results.recordings ?? "{}");
if (newRecordings.length !== recordings.length) {
setRecordings(newRecordings);
continueFetching = false; // Stop the loop if recordings have been updated
}
} catch (error) {
continueFetching = false; // Stop the loop in case of an error
console.error("Failed to fetch recordings:", error);
}
}
};This implementation uses a while loop that continues to fetch recordings until there's a change in the number of recordings or an error occurs, which should prevent any potential stack overflow issues.
| const getRecordings = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const results = await chrome.storage.local.get(["recordings"]); | ||
| const newRecordings = JSON.parse(results.recordings ?? "{}"); | ||
| if (newRecordings.length === recordings.length) { | ||
| getRecordings(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| setRecordings(newRecordings); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enhancing error handling in getRecordings.
The current implementation silently fails by returning in the catch block without any error logging or handling. Consider logging the error or implementing a more robust error handling strategy.
- return;
+ console.error('Failed to fetch recordings:', error);
+ return; // Optionally, handle this error more gracefully.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const getRecordings = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| const results = await chrome.storage.local.get(["recordings"]); | |
| const newRecordings = JSON.parse(results.recordings ?? "{}"); | |
| if (newRecordings.length === recordings.length) { | |
| getRecordings(); | |
| } else { | |
| setRecordings(newRecordings); | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const getRecordings = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| const results = await chrome.storage.local.get(["recordings"]); | |
| const newRecordings = JSON.parse(results.recordings ?? "{}"); | |
| if (newRecordings.length === recordings.length) { | |
| getRecordings(); | |
| } else { | |
| setRecordings(newRecordings); | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to fetch recordings:', error); | |
| return; // Optionally, handle this error more gracefully. | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also make that change, having the console.error will help us identify what is going on those edge cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@elg0nz, I've noted your confirmation to add the console.error for better error tracking in edge cases. If there's anything more you need help with, just let me know!
Learnings added
User: elg0nz
PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#54
File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/index.tsx:22-33
Timestamp: 2024-06-14T20:59:01.048Z
Learning: The `getRecordings` function in `CreateDemo` component of `mocksi-lite` should log errors using `console.error` to help identify issues in edge cases.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of specific code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions.
| if (newRecordings.length === recordings.length) { | ||
| getRecordings(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| setRecordings(newRecordings); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with the rabbit here, are there other options we could explore?
| const getRecordings = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const results = await chrome.storage.local.get(["recordings"]); | ||
| const newRecordings = JSON.parse(results.recordings ?? "{}"); | ||
| if (newRecordings.length === recordings.length) { | ||
| getRecordings(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| setRecordings(newRecordings); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also make that change, having the console.error will help us identify what is going on those edge cases.
# Conflicts: # apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/index.tsx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/index.tsx
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CreateDemocomponent, enhancing data management.Style
DemoItemcomponent to improve truncation and width specification.