Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for sum and kronecker product of COO sparse matrices #45
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add support for sum and kronecker product of COO sparse matrices #45
Changes from 1 commit
949de13
728c9ba
7d346ca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there should be a more efficient to do this. The
union
will iterate over both vectors, and to compute the sum you do it again. Would it be more efficient to do both at the same time?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the moment I don’t have anything in mind. Do you have an idea?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, let's create an issue on the package after this PR is merge to point out to this as a possible improvement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does SparseMatrixCSC do it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I am not wrong you assume here that each matrix has unique pair of (row, col) while I don't think it is necessary true.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But they should be unique, right? I mean, we should merge them in the moment of creating the sparse matrix, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really sorry @albertomercurio , I completely lost track of this PR. There is a discussion on this https://github.com/orgs/JuliaSmoothOptimizers/discussions/51 , and the status is that QuadraticModels is not merging them by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see comment above
Check warning on line 364 in src/coo_linalg.jl
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/coo_linalg.jl#L364
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be tested in the unit tests too