Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add post on how unusable & stupid Copilot Workspace is #63

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jak2k
Copy link
Owner

@Jak2k Jak2k commented Oct 22, 2024


For more details, open the Copilot Workspace session.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
website ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 22, 2024 6:40pm

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new file, copilot-workspace.md, which critiques the Copilot Workspace tool. It outlines various deficiencies such as poor codebase comprehension, performance issues, limited language support, and lack of customization options. The document includes examples of problems encountered, compares Copilot Workspace with other tools, and suggests potential improvements. The author emphasizes the negative impact of these issues on productivity and recommends alternative tools for developers.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
website/post/copilot-workspace.md Added a critique of Copilot Workspace, detailing issues with code comprehension, performance, language support, and customization. Included examples, comparisons with other tools, and suggested improvements.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant CopilotWorkspace
    participant AlternativeTool

    Developer->>CopilotWorkspace: Request code completion
    CopilotWorkspace-->>Developer: Returns suggestion
    Developer->>CopilotWorkspace: Feedback on suggestion
    CopilotWorkspace-->>Developer: Adjusts based on feedback
    Developer->>AlternativeTool: Request code completion
    AlternativeTool-->>Developer: Returns accurate suggestion
Loading

🐇 "In the land of code where bunnies hop,
Copilot's flaws made my heart stop.
With lags and bugs, it did confound,
But alternatives, oh, they abound!
So let’s code with joy, not despair,
For better tools are always near!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
website/post/copilot-workspace.md (4)

1-6: Consider using more professional language in the title and tags.

The current title and tags use emotionally charged language that might detract from the credibility of your technical critique. Consider rephrasing to maintain professionalism while still conveying your concerns.

-title: How unusable & stupid Copilot Workspace is
-tags: [copilot, workspace, coding, disappointment]
+title: A Critical Review of Copilot Workspace's Limitations
+tags: [copilot, workspace, coding, developer-experience, analysis]

18-40: Enhance code examples with real-world scenarios.

The current code examples are overly simplified and don't effectively demonstrate the specific issues you've encountered. Consider:

  1. Using real-world examples from your experience
  2. Including more context around the problematic suggestions
  3. Showing both the incorrect Copilot suggestion and the correct implementation

For Example 2, consider showing the actual error message:

 function exampleFunction() {
   let inScopeVariable = 10;
-  // Copilot Workspace suggested outOfScopeVariable here
-  console.log(outOfScopeVariable);
+  // Copilot Workspace incorrectly suggested:
+  console.log(outOfScopeVariable); // ReferenceError: outOfScopeVariable is not defined
+  
+  // What I actually needed:
+  console.log(inScopeVariable);
 }

94-101: Consider expanding the positive aspects section for a more balanced review.

While your critique raises valid points, the "Positive experiences" section feels brief compared to the detailed criticism. A more balanced approach would:

  1. Provide concrete examples of successful use cases
  2. Quantify the time saved with boilerplate generation
  3. Compare specific features that work well against those that don't

This would help readers make more informed decisions about when Copilot Workspace might still be useful despite its limitations.


119-122: Improve writing style and sentence structure.

Consider varying the sentence structure in the improvements section to make it more engaging:

-1. **Improvement 1**: Enhance the machine learning models to better understand the codebase and provide more relevant suggestions.
-2. **Improvement 2**: Optimize the performance to reduce lag and freezing.
-3. **Improvement 3**: Expand language support to include more programming languages and frameworks.
-4. **Improvement 4**: Provide more customization options to allow developers to tailor the tool to their specific needs.
+• **Machine Learning**: Enhance models for better codebase understanding and more relevant suggestions.
+• **Performance**: Reduce lag and freezing through optimization.
+• **Language Support**: Broaden the range of supported programming languages and frameworks.
+• **Customization**: Enable developers to tailor the tool to their specific workflows.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...rmance to reduce lag and freezing. 3. Improvement 3: Expand language support to include...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)


[style] ~122-~122: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gramming languages and frameworks. 4. Improvement 4: Provide more customization options...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba97f20 and 4a762fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • website/post/copilot-workspace.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
website/post/copilot-workspace.md

[style] ~16-~16: Opting for a less wordy alternative here can improve the clarity of your writing.
Context: ...ely unrelated to the task at hand. This not only wasted my time but also disrupted my workflow. ```javascript // Expected...

(NOT_ONLY_ALSO)


[style] ~48-~48: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it.
Context: ...usefulness for developers who work with a variety of technologies. For example, it might not...

(A_VARIETY_OF)


[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...rmance to reduce lag and freezing. 3. Improvement 3: Expand language support to include...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)


[style] ~122-~122: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gramming languages and frameworks. 4. Improvement 4: Provide more customization options...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)

Comment on lines +114 to +115
- "Copilot Workspace is a promising tool, but it needs significant improvements to be truly useful for developers." - [Source](https://example.com/review1)
- "The performance issues and lack of understanding of the codebase make Copilot Workspace frustrating to use." - [Source](https://example.com/review2)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add proper citations and verifiable sources.

The current links use placeholder domains (example.com) which reduces the credibility of your critique. Consider:

  1. Adding links to actual developer feedback from GitHub issues or discussions
  2. Including timestamps and usernames (with permission) for testimonials
  3. Linking to specific GitHub Copilot Workspace documentation when discussing features
-"Copilot Workspace is a promising tool, but it needs significant improvements to be truly useful for developers." - [Source](https://example.com/review1)
-"The performance issues and lack of understanding of the codebase make Copilot Workspace frustrating to use." - [Source](https://example.com/review2)
+> "Copilot Workspace is a promising tool, but it needs significant improvements to be truly useful for developers." 
+> — [@username on GitHub Discussion #123](https://github.com/github/copilot/discussions/123#discussioncomment-1234567), October 5, 2024

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant