-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More on renaming WG to Activity Area #1613
Conversation
Hi @eduardo-rodrigues - thanks a lot for doing this. I am generally favourable, but I think in many of the cases "X Activity Area" can just be "X Activity". It's a bit less of a mouthful. e.g., The Detector Simulation Working Group considers approaches to making... -> The Detector Simulation Activity considers approaches to making... What do you think? |
Yes, there are places where one could be shorter and omit "Area". I was not sure. In other places "group" is the right word, because it stands for "group of people". |
I just added another commit that corrects the SG mandate, which still mentioned WGs a lot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just two minor things and then we are ready to merge.
Further findings can go into a new PR.
These links are no longer valid, so remove them and note that they are not available
0f62f24
to
282a3e1
Compare
These are calendar URLs, so they don't work when checked as normal web pages
OK, I fixed up the last few minor issues - this is good to go. Thanks @eduardo-rodrigues for having done most of the real work! |
Let me know what you think of these follow-up changes that I noticed were missing.
In short I renamed "Working Group" to "Activity Area" and in some text where "working group" is mentioned I simply left "group", as in "group a people", which seems OK. But one could be more aggressive.