Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More on renaming WG to Activity Area #1613

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member

@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues commented Nov 5, 2024

Let me know what you think of these follow-up changes that I noticed were missing.

In short I renamed "Working Group" to "Activity Area" and in some text where "working group" is mentioned I simply left "group", as in "group a people", which seems OK. But one could be more aggressive.

@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2024 15:35
@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues changed the title More on renaning WG to Activity Area More on renaming WG to Activity Area Nov 6, 2024
@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member

Hi @eduardo-rodrigues - thanks a lot for doing this. I am generally favourable, but I think in many of the cases "X Activity Area" can just be "X Activity". It's a bit less of a mouthful.

e.g., The Detector Simulation Working Group considers approaches to making... -> The Detector Simulation Activity considers approaches to making...

What do you think?

@eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, there are places where one could be shorter and omit "Area". I was not sure. In other places "group" is the right word, because it stands for "group of people".

@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member

I just added another commit that corrects the SG mandate, which still mentioned WGs a lot

Copy link
Member

@hegner hegner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just two minor things and then we are ready to merge.
Further findings can go into a new PR.

_activities/toolsandpackaging.md Show resolved Hide resolved
_activities/toolsandpackaging.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
_activities/detsim.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
_activities/toolsandpackaging.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@graeme-a-stewart graeme-a-stewart force-pushed the eduardo-update-aa-renaming branch from 0f62f24 to 282a3e1 Compare January 7, 2025 13:14
These are calendar URLs, so they don't work when checked as normal web
pages
@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member

OK, I fixed up the last few minor issues - this is good to go. Thanks @eduardo-rodrigues for having done most of the real work!

@graeme-a-stewart graeme-a-stewart merged commit 6dd199c into main Jan 7, 2025
3 checks passed
@graeme-a-stewart graeme-a-stewart deleted the eduardo-update-aa-renaming branch January 7, 2025 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants