-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: helm concurrent deploys with cross dependency #9588
Closed
orlandoburli
wants to merge
6
commits into
GoogleContainerTools:main
from
orlandoburli:feat/helm-deploys-cross-dependency
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a5bcbcb
feat: create the new property dependsOn for HelmRelease
orlandoburli d67868f
feat: implement a channel control with dependent helm packages
orlandoburli d446c8e
feat: update v4beta12.json schema
orlandoburli e346a9c
fix: adding error variable to the output, facilitate the debug
orlandoburli f07969c
feat: adding more log entries, fixing channel infinity wait
orlandoburli 88599a4
feat: creating unit test for concurrent deployments
orlandoburli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about nested dependencies?
ServiceA depends on ServiceB and ServiceB depends on Service C
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have not created a test for this case but, in theory, it should work the same way. Here's why:
One scenario that may happen is a deadlock. I did not think about it on this PR.
Another thing that I'm thinking is that this deserve a integration testing. I'm still learning about this repo and I will create a separated PR for that. This PR already has the label "size/L" 😱
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest you to check this approach #9588 (comment), because the current approach will lead to deadlock(concurrency = 3 and 3 dependencies are waiting, for example).
don't worry about the "size/L", it's ok)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok thanks for the feedback @idsulik . I'll work on that. Now I see the point, it's easy to get to a deadlock situation because of the lack of resources.