Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test gemini action #3

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Test gemini action #3

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

adilshehzad786
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Vulnerability Type File Line(s) Description Recommendation Reference Code Improvement
Hardcoded Secret .github/workflows/code-scan.yml 17 The GEMINI_API_KEY is directly exposed in the workflow file. Although using GitHub secrets, referencing them directly in workflows exposes them in the workflow logs, which can be accessed if the repository is compromised. Store the GEMINI_API_KEY as an encrypted secret within GitHub and access it securely during the workflow execution. Avoid direct usage like ${{ secrets.GEMINI_API_KEY }}. Use the key only within the action's internal logic. Secrets .github/workflows/code-scan.yml Line 16-18: Remove GEMINI_API_KEY and pass it to the action as an input parameter. Pass this value as input to the action and remove these lines. Access input parameters using the inputs context:
api_key: ${{ inputs.gemini_api_key }} inside the action code.
Excessive Permissions .github/workflows/code-scan.yml 6 permissions: write-all grants excessive permissions to the workflow. This poses a security risk if the workflow is compromised, as the attacker could gain full control over the repository. Grant only the necessary permissions required by the workflow, such as pull-requests: write and contents: read. Workflow permissions .github/workflows/code-scan.yml Line 6: Replace write-all with specific required permissions. For example, permissions: { contents: read, pull-requests: write }
Insecure Logging main.py 7 Logging sensitive data or exceptions without proper sanitization can expose sensitive information. Ensure that logs do not contain sensitive data like API keys, tokens, or internal system paths. Implement proper sanitization before logging exceptions or user inputs. Consider using a dedicated security logging mechanism for sensitive events. Logging Best Practices main.py various lines: Review all logger calls and ensure no sensitive data is logged. Implement scrubbing of sensitive data before logging.

Summary:

  • Total number of vulnerabilities found: 3
  • High severity: 2 (🚨🚨)
  • Medium severity: 1 (⚠️)
  • Low severity: 0 (ℹ️)
  • Overall status: Fail

It's crucial to address the hardcoded secret and excessive permissions issues immediately as they pose significant risks. The logging issue, while classified as medium, is also important for maintaining a secure and private environment. Remember that relying on AI for complete security analysis is not a substitute for proper code review and secure coding practices. These vulnerabilities should be addressed before deploying this action to production.

@adilshehzad786 adilshehzad786 merged commit 6f3cdd1 into main Dec 11, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant