-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix #17 add fake node to graph view #18
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe codebase has undergone a refinement where a function now accommodates a default parameter, enhancing its flexibility. Simultaneously, the strategy for generating placeholder nodes within a mapping structure has been streamlined, with a new approach to managing categories and their associated color values, optimizing the way source and destination nodes are represented. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/graph/model.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
app/graph/model.ts (1)
- 186-199: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [178-196]
When creating a new node or updating a fake node, the color is set using
getCategoryColorValue(category.index)
. This is consistent with the intended use of the function. However, ensure that the category index is always within the valid range ofCOLORS_ORDER
.Verification successful
The implementation of
getCategoryColorValue
inapp/graph/model.ts
includes a check to ensure that the provided index is within the bounds of theCOLORS_ORDER
array. If the index is greater than or equal to the length ofCOLORS_ORDER
, it is reset to 0. This means that the function is designed to handle cases where the index might be out of range by defaulting to the first color.Given this information, the review comment's concern about ensuring that the category index is always within the valid range of
COLORS_ORDER
is addressed by the implementation of thegetCategoryColorValue
function itself.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that category.index is always within the valid range of COLORS_ORDER. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'getCategoryColorValue($_.index)'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of getCategoryColorValue to analyze its usage context. rg "getCategoryColorValue"Length of output: 463
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of getCategoryColorValue to see how it handles the index range. rg "function getCategoryColorValue" -A 10 app/graph/model.tsLength of output: 323
Summary by CodeRabbit