Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 24, 2023. It is now read-only.

Issues: EclipseFdn/EFSP

24 Open 43 Closed
24 Open 43 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Describe 30/60/90 day activities for a specification committee operations
#69 opened May 26, 2022 by waynebeaton
@waynebeaton
3
Notify specification committee immediately after posting a project specification project proposal for community review operations
#68 opened Nov 16, 2021 by waynebeaton
@waynebeaton @paulbuck
5
The specification committee should be where an alternative patent license type is proposed
#67 opened Sep 28, 2021 by starksm64
11
"Candidate Final Specificiation" does not read well
#66 opened Sep 25, 2021 by Emily-Jiang
Project artifacts do not have to be developed by the project team
#64 opened Sep 17, 2021 by waynebeaton
@waynebeaton
The project team owns the proposal document
#61 opened Aug 23, 2021 by waynebeaton
2
Process for retiring a Specification?
#60 opened Aug 10, 2021 by kwsutter
4
Clarify if plan is needed for Creation Review
#58 opened Jul 29, 2021 by edbratt
6
Add a "Front Matter Requirements" section to the operations guide
#54 opened Jun 17, 2021 by waynebeaton
Requiring Profiles to include the applicable TCKs
#53 opened Jun 11, 2021 by paulbuck
1
Clarify what is a "testing party’s website" in the TCK License
#52 opened Jun 9, 2021 by bjhargrave
4
Clarify the nature of a "Specification"
#46 opened May 12, 2021 by waynebeaton
3
Reviews and ballots are only required for releases of specifications
#44 opened May 10, 2021 by waynebeaton
The notion of "Platform" adds no value
#43 opened May 3, 2021 by waynebeaton
9
Specification track without notion of TCK
#41 opened Apr 22, 2021 by DBees
5
"Super-majority of the Strategic Members of the Working Group" doesn't work in the general case
#39 opened Apr 13, 2021 by waynebeaton
@waynebeaton
3
Clarify that designation of a profile requires a ballot of the specification committee
#36 opened Apr 6, 2021 by waynebeaton
1
Specifications are added to an existing specification project via plan review
#30 opened Jan 20, 2021 by waynebeaton
Add selection of the specification Patent License to the operations guide
#28 opened Jan 18, 2021 by waynebeaton
Clarify the conditions by which a Participant Representative may be appointed
#23 opened Oct 5, 2020 by waynebeaton
6
Patent rights are granted via the IP Policy
#21 opened Jun 12, 2020 by waynebeaton
The wording for the approval process for adding new open source licenses is ambiguous
#20 opened Jun 3, 2020 by waynebeaton
Use a variable to indicate "DRAFT" state
#18 opened Jun 14, 2019 by waynebeaton
Must the TCK be developed by an Eclipse project?
#16 opened Jun 14, 2019 by waynebeaton
1
ProTip! Updated in the last three days: updated:>2025-01-29.