Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Submit govulncheck results to GitHub Code Scanning #4071

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

cbandy
Copy link
Member

@cbandy cbandy commented Jan 14, 2025

The SARIF results from govulncheck should be compatible with GitHub since v1.1.4.

See: https://github.com/golang/vuln/releases/tag/v1.1.4

Checklist:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like them to be included?
  • Have you updated or added documentation for the change, as applicable?
  • Have you tested your changes on all related environments with successful results, as applicable?
    • Have you added automated tests?

Type of Changes:

  • Testing enhancement

The SARIF results from govulncheck should be compatible with GitHub since v1.1.4.

See: https://github.com/golang/vuln/releases/tag/v1.1.4
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@cbandy cbandy merged commit 92f035e into main Jan 14, 2025
18 checks passed
@cbandy cbandy deleted the cbandy/govulncheck branch January 14, 2025 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants