-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor : typescript integration in src/simulator/src/app.ts #431
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on TypeScript integration for the simulator source files. The changes involve converting the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/view/panel.ui.ts (3)
7-38
: Check for missing conversion/parsing of stored keys
IfuserKeys
ordefaultKeys
are stored as JSON strings via localStorage, consider parsing them (e.g.,JSON.parse(...)
) before usage. This will prevent runtime type errors and better align with standard usage oflocalStorage
.
44-57
: Ensure robust approach to clearing duplicate keys
Currently, theoverride
function just sets the duplicate key’s value to an empty string. There may be cases where the user wants to retain a previously mapped key or be notified of conflicts. Adding a user prompt or highlight of the conflict could improve the UX.
73-79
: Potential confirmation or toast for successful submission
After callingsetUserKeys()
and then updating the UI, consider offering some feedback to the user (e.g., a confirmation message) to indicate that their hotkey changes have been saved.src/simulator/src/app.ts (3)
6-6
: Consider using an enum instead of a union type forDeviceType
While the union type works fine here, an enum might be beneficial if you anticipate more types or advanced usage in the future.
33-37
: Potentially define a more specific interface or type for subcircuits
Currently,subcircuits
is aRecord<string, unknown>
. Consider creating a dedicated interface if subcircuits in your codebase follow a known structure or have specialized fields, improving type safety.
Line range hint
39-243
: Consider externalizing circuit configuration data
While it’s valid to keep the circuit configuration inline, consider moving large configuration objects likejs
into a separate JSON or a config file. This can reduce clutter in your main source file, improve readability, and allow easier updates or dynamic loading.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/simulator/src/app.ts
(2 hunks)src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/view/panel.ui.js
(0 hunks)src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/view/panel.ui.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/view/panel.ui.js
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/simulator/src/hotkey_binder/view/panel.ui.ts (2)
1-2
: Confirm usage oflocalStorage.get()
vs. the standardlocalStorage.getItem()
It appears you are callinglocalStorage.get('userKeys')
andlocalStorage.get('defaultKeys')
instead of the standard browser API methodlocalStorage.getItem()
. Kindly verify if this comes from a custom storage utility or if it should be switched tolocalStorage.getItem()
to ensure compatibility.
62-69
: Good use of DOM manipulation for closing the edit interface
Hiding elements and clearing text content is straightforward and maintainable. Keep it up.src/simulator/src/app.ts (1)
8-20
: Interfaces align well with the circuit concept
TheDevice
interface is cleanly designed.bits
is mandatory whilenet
,order
, and others are properly marked optional, which is good for maintainability.
The failure here is due to code climate, 17 lines of code in updateHTML cannot be written in 5 lines @niladrix719 @JoshVarga |
Fixes #414
@niladrix719 @JoshVarga @Arnabdaz @devartstar
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Refactor
Chores