JS to TS : simulator/src/data/load.ts #422 #422
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces TypeScript migration for the simulator's data loading and project management modules. The changes involve converting the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
CC:- @niladrix719 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/simulator/src/data/load.ts (3)
132-162: Initialize layout properties only when necessaryThe layout initialization code can be optimized by checking if
data.layoutis undefined before setting default values. This avoids unnecessary computations when layout data is provided.Consider wrapping the default layout initialization within an
elseblock to ensure it's only executed whendata.layoutis not provided.
173-175: Simplify base URL determinationThe logic for determining
baseUrlcan be simplified. The current check for'null'may be unnecessary and could be error-prone.Simplify the URL assignment as follows:
- const baseUrl = window.location.origin !== 'null' ? window.location.origin : 'http://localhost:4000' + const baseUrl = window.location.origin || 'http://localhost:4000'
181-182: Avoid settingglobalScopeto undefined before resetSetting
globalScopetoundefinedbefore callingresetScopeList()may not be necessary, asresetScopeList()should handle scope resets internally.Consider removing the line or ensuring that
resetScopeList()accounts for theglobalScopereset.src/components/Panels/ElementsPanel/ElementsPanel.vue (1)
Line range hint
148-148: Consider localization for element namesIf element names are subject to localization, ensure that the displayed names are wrapped with localization functions.
Modify the code to accommodate localization if necessary.
- <p class="d-inline-block">{{ element.name }}</p> + <p class="d-inline-block">{{ $t('element_names.' + element.name) }}</p>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/Panels/ElementsPanel/ElementsPanel.vue(3 hunks)src/simulator/src/data/load.js(0 hunks)src/simulator/src/data/load.ts(1 hunks)src/simulator/src/data/project.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/simulator/src/data/load.js
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/simulator/src/data/project.ts (2)
123-139: Confirm removal of unsaved changes promptThe code block that prompts users about unsaved changes has been commented out. Confirm that this behavior is intentionally removed, as it may lead to loss of unsaved work without warning.
If the removal is intentional, ensure that users are informed through other means to prevent accidental data loss.
158-178:⚠️ Potential issueReview logic change in
newProjectfunctionThe condition in the
newProjectfunction has been altered, which might affect how new projects are initiated when unsaved changes exist.Ensure that the new logic correctly handles cases where verification is required and when unsaved changes are present.
Consider revising the condition:
- if (verify || projectSaved || !checkToSave()) { + if (!verify && !projectSaved && checkToSave() && !(await confirmOption(...))) {Please confirm that this change aligns with the intended behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Logic change in
newProjectfunction is correct and improvedThe new implementation is logically equivalent to the original but more explicit in its intent. The function correctly:
- Skips confirmation when verification is required (
verify=true)- Prompts for confirmation only when necessary (unsaved changes exist and
verify=false)- Maintains the same behavior while being more readable
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the complete newProject function implementation ast-grep --pattern 'async function newProject($_) { $$$ }' # Find checkToSave function implementation ast-grep --pattern 'function checkToSave() { $$$ }' # Search for verify parameter usage rg "verify" "src/simulator/src/data/project.ts" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 2695
src/components/Panels/ElementsPanel/ElementsPanel.vue (3)
43-43: Add element name display in search resultsDisplaying the element names alongside their icons improves usability by helping users identify elements more easily.
81-81: Add element name display in expansion panelsConsistently displaying element names in both search results and expansion panels enhances the user interface and experience.
128-131: Ensure text overflow is handled properlyThe added
<div>for element names should handle text overflow to maintain layout integrity.Test with longer element names to ensure that the text does not overflow or cause layout issues.
| type CircuitElement = any; // Replace with proper type | ||
| type Scope = any; // Replace with proper type | ||
| type JSONData = Record<string, any>; // Generic type for JSON data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace 'any' types with specific type definitions
Using any reduces the benefits of TypeScript's type safety. Defining specific types for CircuitElement, Scope, and JSONData will enhance code reliability and maintainability.
Please replace the any types with appropriate interfaces or classes that reflect the actual structures used.
|
|
||
| obj.label = data.label; | ||
| obj.labelDirection = | ||
| data.labelDirection || oppositeDirection[fixDirection[obj.direction]]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Undefined 'fixDirection' variable
The variable fixDirection is used but not defined or imported, which will cause a runtime error.
Ensure that fixDirection is properly defined or imported before using it. If it's meant to adjust the direction, consider importing it from its module.
| data.x, | ||
| data.y, | ||
| scope, | ||
| ...(data.customData.constructorParamaters || []) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in 'constructorParamaters'
There's a typo in data.customData.constructorParamaters; it should be constructorParameters. This might lead to undefined behavior or errors during object construction.
Apply this diff to correct the typo:
- ...(data.customData.constructorParamaters || [])
+ ...(data.customData.constructorParameters || [])📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ...(data.customData.constructorParamaters || []) | |
| ...(data.customData.constructorParameters || []) |
nickhil-verma
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/simulator/src/app.ts (3)
22-32: Add port name validation.The
Connectorinterface allows any string for port names. Consider adding validation for allowed port names.+type PortName = 'in' | 'out' | 'rd0data' | 'rd1data' | 'rd0addr' | 'rd1addr' | 'wr0addr' | 'wr1addr' | 'wr0data' | 'wr1data' | 'rd1clk' | 'wr0clk' | 'wr1clk'; interface Connector { to: { id: string; - port: string; + port: PortName; }; from: { id: string; - port: string; + port: PortName; }; name: string; }
Line range hint
43-247: Refactor large initialization block.The circuit initialization block is quite large and could benefit from being split into smaller, more manageable functions.
+const createMemoryDevice = (): Device => ({ + label: 'mem', + type: 'Memory', + bits: 5, + abits: 4, + words: 16, + offset: 0, + rdports: [ + {}, + { clock_polarity: true } + ], + wrports: [ + { clock_polarity: true }, + { clock_polarity: true } + ], + memdata: [13, '00001', 3, '11111'] +}); + +const createInputDevices = (): Record<string, Device> => ({ + dev0: { type: 'Input', net: 'clk', order: 0, bits: 1 }, + dev1: { type: 'Input', net: 'addr', order: 1, bits: 4 }, + // ... other input devices +}); + +const createOutputDevices = (): Record<string, Device> => ({ + dev2: { type: 'Output', net: 'data', order: 2, bits: 5 }, + dev4: { type: 'Output', net: 'data2', order: 4, bits: 5 } +}); + +const createConnectors = (): Connector[] => ([ + // ... connectors array +]); const js: Circuit = { - devices: { - dev0: { ... }, - // ... other devices - }, - connectors: [ ... ], + devices: { + ...createInputDevices(), + ...createOutputDevices(), + dev9: createMemoryDevice() + }, + connectors: createConnectors(), subcircuits: {} };
40-42: Consider moving event listener to a separate file.The event listener and setup logic could be moved to a separate file to improve modularity.
+// circuitInitializer.ts +import { setup } from './setup'; +import { initializeCircuit } from './circuitConfig'; + +export const initializeApp = () => { + document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => { + setup(); + initializeCircuit(); + }); +};
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/simulator/src/app.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/simulator/src/app.ts (1)
4-6: Verify device types coverage.Let's ensure that all device types used in the codebase are covered by the Device interface.
✅ Verification successful
Device interface types are correctly defined
The Device interface correctly covers all device types ('Input', 'Output', 'Memory') used in the codebase. All other type assignments found are unrelated and used in different contexts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for device type assignments in the codebase echo "Searching for device type assignments..." rg -g '*.{ts,js,vue}' "type:\s*['\"](\w+)['\"]" --only-matching --replace '$1' | sort -u # Search for type property access echo "Searching for type property access..." ast-grep --pattern 'device.type' -l ts,js,vueLength of output: 2725
| interface Circuit { | ||
| devices: Record<string, Device>; | ||
| connectors: Connector[]; | ||
| subcircuits: Record<string, unknown>; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using unknown type.
The subcircuits field uses the unknown type, which bypasses TypeScript's type checking. Consider defining a proper type for subcircuits.
interface Circuit {
devices: Record<string, Device>;
connectors: Connector[];
- subcircuits: Record<string, unknown>;
+ subcircuits: Record<string, Circuit>;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| interface Circuit { | |
| devices: Record<string, Device>; | |
| connectors: Connector[]; | |
| subcircuits: Record<string, unknown>; | |
| } | |
| interface Circuit { | |
| devices: Record<string, Device>; | |
| connectors: Connector[]; | |
| subcircuits: Record<string, Circuit>; | |
| } |
| interface Device { | ||
| type: 'Input' | 'Output' | 'Memory'; | ||
| net: string; | ||
| order?: number; | ||
| bits: number; | ||
| label?: string; | ||
| abits?: number; | ||
| words?: number; | ||
| offset?: number; | ||
| rdports?: Array<{ | ||
| clock_polarity?: boolean; | ||
| }>; | ||
| wrports?: Array<{ | ||
| clock_polarity?: boolean; | ||
| }>; | ||
| memdata?: (number | string)[]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Expand device types and add JSDoc documentation.
The Device interface has a limited set of device types and lacks documentation for complex fields.
+/**
+ * Represents a device in the circuit simulator.
+ * @property type - The type of the device
+ * @property net - Network identifier
+ * @property order - Optional display order
+ * @property bits - Number of bits
+ * @property label - Optional device label
+ * @property abits - Optional address bits for memory devices
+ * @property words - Optional word count for memory devices
+ * @property memdata - Optional memory initialization data
+ */
interface Device {
- type: 'Input' | 'Output' | 'Memory';
+ type: 'Input' | 'Output' | 'Memory' | 'Register' | 'Counter' | 'Clock' | 'AndGate' | 'OrGate' | 'NotGate' | 'XorGate';
// ... rest of the interface
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| interface Device { | |
| type: 'Input' | 'Output' | 'Memory'; | |
| net: string; | |
| order?: number; | |
| bits: number; | |
| label?: string; | |
| abits?: number; | |
| words?: number; | |
| offset?: number; | |
| rdports?: Array<{ | |
| clock_polarity?: boolean; | |
| }>; | |
| wrports?: Array<{ | |
| clock_polarity?: boolean; | |
| }>; | |
| memdata?: (number | string)[]; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Represents a device in the circuit simulator. | |
| * @property type - The type of the device | |
| * @property net - Network identifier | |
| * @property order - Optional display order | |
| * @property bits - Number of bits | |
| * @property label - Optional device label | |
| * @property abits - Optional address bits for memory devices | |
| * @property words - Optional word count for memory devices | |
| * @property memdata - Optional memory initialization data | |
| */ | |
| interface Device { | |
| type: 'Input' | 'Output' | 'Memory' | 'Register' | 'Counter' | 'Clock' | 'AndGate' | 'OrGate' | 'NotGate' | 'XorGate'; | |
| net: string; | |
| order?: number; | |
| bits: number; | |
| label?: string; | |
| abits?: number; | |
| words?: number; | |
| offset?: number; | |
| rdports?: Array<{ | |
| clock_polarity?: boolean; | |
| }>; | |
| wrports?: Array<{ | |
| clock_polarity?: boolean; | |
| }>; | |
| memdata?: (number | string)[]; | |
| } |
Fixes #414
Describe the changes you have made in this PR -
Screenshots of the changes (If any) -
Note: Please check Allow edits from maintainers. if you would like us to assist in the PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Refactor
Chores