Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrections for uninitialised fields in d3q27_pf_velocity #479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

llaniewski
Copy link
Member

This fixes the problem of uninitialised values in the InitFromFieldsStage stage.

@shkodm Could you make it a priority to test if this doesn't break your computations?

@llaniewski llaniewski added the model Model development label Jan 4, 2024
@llaniewski llaniewski requested a review from shkodm January 4, 2024 01:19
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9d3bd18) 43.23% compared to head (0deb2fb) 89.08%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #479       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   43.23%   89.08%   +45.84%     
===========================================
  Files         166        6      -160     
  Lines        7535      348     -7187     
===========================================
- Hits         3258      310     -2948     
+ Misses       4277       38     -4239     
Flag Coverage Δ
d2q9 ?
d3q27_PSM_NEBB ?
d3q27_pf_velocity ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@shkodm
Copy link
Member

shkodm commented Jan 5, 2024

It seems that breaks something... I am investigating now

@shkodm
Copy link
Member

shkodm commented Jan 5, 2024

It seems that breaks something... I am investigating now

Never mind, everything seems to be working fine. Tested on the actual fracture case I am running and compare visualisation. Should be good to merge

@llaniewski llaniewski merged commit f7a0f5f into CFD-GO:master Jan 5, 2024
53 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
model Model development
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants