(Chore) Add log #2327
(Chore) Add log #2327
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
node/pkg/chain/helper/signer.go (1)
139-142: Consider adding metrics for failed renewals.The error handling is well implemented, but adding metrics for failed renewals would improve observability and enable proactive monitoring.
Consider adding a counter metric for failed renewals. Example:
err = s.CheckAndUpdateSignerPK(ctx) if err != nil { + metrics.SignerRenewalFailures.Inc() log.Error().Str("Player", "Signer").Err(err).Msg("failed to renew signer pk") }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
node/pkg/chain/helper/signer.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
node/pkg/chain/helper/signer.go (1)
130-133: LGTM! Verify error recovery behavior.
The error handling for initial signer renewal is well implemented. However, let's verify that continuing the ticker loop after an initial failure is the intended behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the autoRenew function and its error handling pattern.
Let me check the ticker implementation and renewal interval to better understand the recovery mechanism.
Continuing after initial failure is the correct behavior
The error handling implementation is appropriate because:
- The signer renewal operates with a 12-hour interval (DefaultSignerRenewInterval)
- The renewal threshold is 7 days (DefaultSignerRenewThreshold)
- Continuing the ticker loop after initial failure allows for automatic recovery in subsequent attempts
- The error is properly logged for monitoring and debugging purposes
This design provides a robust self-healing mechanism where temporary failures can be recovered in the next renewal cycle, while still maintaining visibility through error logging.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any retry mechanisms or recovery patterns in the codebase
# Look for similar patterns in other renewal or initialization code
# Search for retry patterns in renewal code
rg -A 5 "failed to renew" --type go
# Search for recovery patterns in initialization code
rg -A 5 "failed to.*initialize" --type go
Length of output: 1161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of autoRenew and CheckAndUpdateSignerPK
ast-grep --pattern 'func autoRenew(ctx context.Context) {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'func (s *Signer) CheckAndUpdateSignerPK($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for any retry mechanisms in the signer package
rg -B 2 -A 5 'retry|attempt|backoff' node/pkg/chain/helper/
Length of output: 3661
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full context of the autoRenew function and renewal interval
rg -B 10 -A 10 "func.*autoRenew" node/pkg/chain/helper/signer.go
# Look for any configuration or constants related to renewal
rg "RenewInterval|SignerRenew" node/pkg/chain/helper/
Length of output: 1101
Description
Leave log on initial signer renewal failure
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment