Revert "(DAL) Pooling broadcast (#2246)" #2253
Conversation
This reverts commit 12378ae.
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve significant modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Hub
participant Client
participant Data
Hub->>Client: Send data
Client->>Hub: Acknowledge receipt
Hub->>Data: Manage concurrent writes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- node/pkg/dal/hub/hub.go (4 hunks)
- node/pkg/utils/pool/pool.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- node/pkg/utils/pool/pool.go
Additional comments not posted (1)
node/pkg/dal/hub/hub.go (1)
154-171: RefactorcastSubmissionDatato use goroutines andsync.WaitGroupeffectively.The refactoring from a pooled concurrency model to a direct goroutine-based approach using
sync.WaitGroupis a significant change. This approach simplifies the concurrency management and potentially improves performance by reducing overhead. However, it's crucial to ensure that the goroutines are managed correctly to avoid potential data races or deadlocks.
- Correctness: The use of
sync.WaitGroupensures that the main function waits for all goroutines to complete, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the data being broadcasted.- Performance: This change could improve performance by reducing the overhead associated with managing a worker pool.
- Maintainability: The new approach is generally simpler and more straightforward, which could improve maintainability.
However, it's important to verify that this change integrates well with the rest of the system and does not introduce new issues.
The changes are conceptually sound and improve the code's structure and performance.
Run the following script to verify the integration of this change with the rest of the system:
Verification successful
Concurrency model in
hub.gois correctly implemented.The use of
sync.WaitGroupand mutex locks innode/pkg/dal/hub/hub.gois implemented correctly. The code ensures proper synchronization and completion of goroutines without introducing data races or deadlocks.
- Correctness: The
sync.WaitGroupand mutex usage is consistent and correct.- No issues found: No deadlocks or data races were detected in the codebase related to this change.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new goroutine-based approach with the rest of the system. # Test: Search for potential issues related to the new concurrency model. rg --type go -A 5 $'sync.WaitGroup' | grep -i 'deadlock'Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of `sync.WaitGroup` to ensure they are correctly implemented. rg --type go 'sync.WaitGroup' -A 10 # Check for any other concurrency-related issues, such as data races or improper locking/unlocking of mutexes. rg --type go 'RLock\(\)|RUnlock\(\)|Lock\(\)|Unlock\(\)' -A 5Length of output: 35010
This reverts commit 12378ae.
Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
Please also include relevant motivation and context.
List any dependencies that are required for this change.
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment