-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(API) Migrate API codebase (root -> node) #2056
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes involve a significant restructuring of the project, primarily reorganizing the API components under a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant Database
Client->>API: POST /api/errors (insert error)
API->>Database: INSERT INTO errors (error data)
Database-->>API: Success (error ID)
API-->>Client: 201 Created (error ID)
Client->>API: GET /api/errors (retrieve errors)
API->>Database: SELECT * FROM errors
Database-->>API: All errors
API-->>Client: 200 OK (list of errors)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 35
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (58)
node/pkg/api/proxy/queries.go (1)
6-6
: Consider adding a WHERE clause for filtering.The
GetProxy
query retrieves all proxies. Consider adding a WHERE clause or pagination if the table is large to improve performance.node/pkg/api/service/queries.go (2)
9-9
: Consider adding filtering or pagination.The
GetService
query retrieves all services. Consider adding filtering or pagination if the table is large to improve performance.
25-25
: Potential Issue with Handling Deletions inDeleteServiceById
The
DeleteServiceById
query deletes a service by ID, but there are foreign key constraints in thelisteners
andreporters
tables referencingservices.service_id
withoutON DELETE CASCADE
. This could lead to orphaned records when a service is deleted. Consider implementing cascading deletes or additional logic to handle related records appropriately.
- Foreign key constraints without cascading delete:
listeners_service_id_fkey
inlisteners
tablereporters_service_id_fkey
inreporters
tableAnalysis chain
Ensure proper handling of deletions.
The
DeleteServiceById
query deletes a service by ID. Ensure that the application logic handles the implications of deletions, such as cascading effects or orphaned records.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of deletions for the DeleteServiceById query. # Test: Search for the DeleteServiceById query usage. Expect: Proper handling of deletions in the code. rg --type go -A 5 $'DeleteServiceById'Length of output: 1104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for foreign key constraints related to the 'services' table in SQL files. rg --type sql 'FOREIGN KEY' --context 5 # Search for any additional logic in Go files that might handle cascading deletions or orphaned records. rg --type go 'DELETE' -A 10Length of output: 62654
dockerfiles/orakl-api.Dockerfile (1)
12-12
: Incorrect path in Dockerfile build commandThe specified path
./cmd/api/main.go
in the Dockerfile does not exist. It seems you intended to use./node/cmd/api/main.go
instead. Please update the Dockerfile to reflect the correct path.
- Dockerfile Line 12: Change
./cmd/api/main.go
to./node/cmd/api/main.go
.Analysis chain
Check the build command for correctness.
The
RUN go build -o apibin -ldflags="-w -s" ./cmd/api/main.go
command specifies the path to the main Go file. Ensure that this path is correct and the build succeeds.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the build command path. # Test: Check the existence of the main.go file at the specified path. Expect: The file exists. fd --type f --search-path node --glob 'cmd/api/main.go'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for main.go file in the entire repository to verify its existence and path. # Test: Check for any main.go file in the repository. Expect: At least one result. fd --type f --glob 'main.go'Length of output: 773
node/cmd/api/main.go (1)
21-28
: Consider handling the absence of the.env
file more gracefully.While the log message indicates the absence of the
.env
file, consider using a more robust logging mechanism or handling it differently in production environments.node/pkg/api/tests/apierr_test.go (1)
17-20
: Consider handling missing.env
files more gracefully.The test currently prints a message if the
.env
file is not found but continues execution. Consider logging this message or handling it more explicitly to avoid confusion during test runs.- fmt.Print("env file is not found, continueing without .env file") + fmt.Println("Warning: .env file not found, continuing without it")node/pkg/api/blocks/controller.go (1)
33-35
: Clarify error messages for missing query parameters.The error message "service is required" could be more descriptive by indicating that it is a query parameter. This can help users understand the issue more clearly.
- return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, "service is required") + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, "query parameter 'service' is required")node/pkg/api/tests/listener_test.go (1)
16-97
: Enhance test assertions and error handling.
- Consider adding assertions for operations like setup and cleanup to ensure they are executed successfully.
- Use
t.Log
ort.Error
instead offmt.Print
for logging within tests to integrate better with the testing framework.// Example: t.Log("env file is not found, continuing without .env file")
node/pkg/api/tests/vrf_test.go (1)
15-94
: Enhance test assertions and error handling.
- Consider adding assertions for operations like setup and cleanup to ensure they are executed successfully.
- Use
t.Log
ort.Error
instead offmt.Print
for logging within tests to integrate better with the testing framework.// Example: t.Log("env file is not found, continuing without .env file")
Tools
Gitleaks
28-28: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
node/pkg/api/tests/reporter_test.go (7)
17-20
: Handle errors when loading environment variables.Consider handling the error more explicitly or logging it for better debugging.
- if err != nil { - fmt.Print("env file is not found, continueing without .env file") + if err != nil { + fmt.Printf("Warning: .env file not found. Error: %v\n", err)
53-55
: Enhance assertion messages for clarity.Adding descriptive messages to assertions can help in debugging test failures.
- assert.Nil(t, err) + assert.Nil(t, err, "expected no error when inserting chain") - assert.Nil(t, err) + assert.Nil(t, err, "expected no error when inserting service")
64-65
: Add assertion messages for insertion.Including messages in assertions provides context in case of test failures.
- assert.Nil(t, err) + assert.Nil(t, err, "expected no error when inserting reporter data")
70-71
: Clarify assertion messages for list operations.Descriptive messages in assertions can aid in understanding test failures.
- assert.Less(t, totalBefore, totalAfter) + assert.Less(t, totalBefore, totalAfter, "expected more reporters after insertion")
75-76
: Improve assertion messages for read operations.Providing context in assertion messages enhances test readability and debugging.
- assert.Equalf(t, insertResult, singleReadResult, "should be inserted") + assert.Equalf(t, insertResult, singleReadResult, "expected inserted reporter to match read result")
82-83
: Refine assertion messages for patch operations.Descriptive messages in assertions help clarify test expectations.
- assert.Equalf(t, singleReadResult, patchResult, "should be patched") + assert.Equalf(t, singleReadResult, patchResult, "expected patched reporter to match read result")
87-88
: Enhance assertion messages for delete operations.Including messages in assertions provides clarity in case of test failures.
- assert.Equalf(t, patchResult, deleteResult, "should be deleted") + assert.Equalf(t, patchResult, deleteResult, "expected deleted reporter to match patched result")node/pkg/api/vrf/controller.go (10)
41-42
: Provide descriptive error messages for body parsing.Descriptive error messages can aid in identifying issues during request handling.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("failed to parse request body: %v", err))
46-47
: Improve error messages for validation failures.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("validation failed: %v", err))
51-52
: Enhance error messages for database queries.Descriptive error messages can help identify issues with database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch chain: %v", err))
81-82
: Provide descriptive error messages for body parsing.Improving error messages can aid in debugging request handling issues.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("failed to parse request body: %v", err))
86-88
: Enhance error messages for database queries.Descriptive error messages help identify issues with database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch chain: %v", err))
101-102
: Improve error messages for database queries.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch VRF by ID: %v", err))
112-113
: Provide descriptive error messages for body parsing.Improving error messages can aid in debugging request handling issues.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("failed to parse request body: %v", err))
116-117
: Improve error messages for validation failures.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("validation failed: %v", err))
127-128
: Enhance error messages for database queries.Descriptive error messages help identify issues with database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to update VRF by ID: %v", err))
137-138
: Improve error messages for database queries.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to delete VRF by ID: %v", err))node/pkg/api/listener/controller.go (12)
39-40
: Provide descriptive error messages for body parsing.Descriptive error messages can aid in identifying issues during request handling.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("failed to parse request body: %v", err))
44-45
: Improve error messages for validation failures.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("validation failed: %v", err))
50-51
: Enhance error messages for database queries.Descriptive error messages can help identify issues with database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch chain: %v", err))
54-55
: Provide descriptive error messages for service queries.Improving error messages can aid in debugging database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch service: %v", err))
83-84
: Provide descriptive error messages for body parsing.Improving error messages can aid in debugging request handling issues.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("failed to parse request body: %v", err))
89-90
: Enhance error messages for chain queries.Descriptive error messages help identify issues with database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch chain: %v", err))
97-98
: Provide descriptive error messages for service queries.Improving error messages can aid in debugging database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch service: %v", err))
113-114
: Improve error messages for database queries.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to fetch listener by ID: %v", err))
124-125
: Provide descriptive error messages for body parsing.Improving error messages can aid in debugging request handling issues.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("failed to parse request body: %v", err))
129-130
: Improve error messages for validation failures.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf("validation failed: %v", err))
137-138
: Enhance error messages for database queries.Descriptive error messages help identify issues with database interactions.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to update listener by ID: %v", err))
147-148
: Improve error messages for database queries.Providing context in error messages enhances debugging.
- return err + return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusInternalServerError, fmt.Sprintf("failed to delete listener by ID: %v", err))node/migrations/api/000001_initialize_tables.up.sql (4)
1-8
: Ensure consistency in naming conventions.The table
adapters
usesadapter_hash
as a unique key andadapter_id
as a primary key. Ensure that the naming conventions for columns and constraints are consistent across all tables.
24-40
: Consider indexing frequently queried columns.For the
aggregators
table, consider adding indexes on columns likeadapter_id
andchain_id
if they are frequently queried. This can improve query performance.
102-112
: Encrypt sensitive data.In the
reporters
table, theprivateKey
column stores sensitive information. Ensure that this data is encrypted both at rest and in transit to enhance security.
114-124
: Ensure secure storage of cryptographic keys.In the
vrf_keys
table, sensitive cryptographic keys are stored. Implement appropriate security measures to protect these keys, such as encryption and access controls.node/pkg/api/utils/custom_types.go (6)
37-61
: Improve error messages for unexpected types.The
UnmarshalJSON
method forCustomFloat
returns a generic error message for unexpected types. Consider including the actual value in the error message for better debugging.- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomFloat: %T", value) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomFloat: %T, value: %v", value, value)
67-86
: Improve error messages for unexpected types.Similar to
CustomFloat
, theUnmarshalJSON
method forCustomBool
could benefit from more informative error messages.- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomBoolean: %T", value) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomBoolean: %T, value: %v", value, value)
92-124
: Improve error messages for unexpected types.The
UnmarshalJSON
method forCustomInt32
should include the actual value in error messages for better debugging.- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for customInt32: %T", value) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for customInt32: %T, value: %v", value, value)
135-167
: Improve error messages for unexpected types.The
UnmarshalJSON
method forCustomInt64
should include the actual value in error messages for better debugging.- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomInt64: %T", value) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomInt64: %T, value: %v", value, value)
178-194
: Improve error messages for unexpected types.The
Scan
method forCustomDateTime
should include the actual value in error messages for better debugging.- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomDateTime: %T", src) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomDateTime: %T, value: %v", src, src)
196-217
: Improve error messages for unexpected types.The
UnmarshalJSON
method forCustomDateTime
should include the actual value in error messages for better debugging.- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomDateTime: %T", value) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected type for CustomDateTime: %T, value: %v", value, value)node/pkg/api/reporter/controller.go (6)
46-85
: Ensure proper error handling and logging.In the
insert
function, errors are returned directly. Consider logging errors for better traceability and debugging.if err := c.BodyParser(payload); err != nil { log.Error(err) return err }
87-141
: Ensure proper error handling and logging.In the
get
function, errors are returned directly. Consider logging errors for better traceability and debugging.if err != nil { log.Error(err) return err }
143-184
: Ensure proper error handling and logging.In the
getByOracleAddress
function, errors are returned directly. Consider logging errors for better traceability and debugging.if err != nil { log.Error(err) return err }
186-200
: Ensure proper error handling and logging.In the
getById
function, errors are returned directly. Consider logging errors for better traceability and debugging.if err != nil { log.Error(err) return err }
202-232
: Ensure proper error handling and logging.In the
updateById
function, errors are returned directly. Consider logging errors for better traceability and debugging.if err != nil { log.Error(err) return err }
234-248
: Ensure proper error handling and logging.In the
deleteById
function, errors are returned directly. Consider logging errors for better traceability and debugging.if err != nil { log.Error(err) return err }node/pkg/api/utils/utils.go (4)
51-63
: Consider logging errors inRawQueryWithoutReturn
.Adding logging for errors can aid in debugging issues with query execution.
if err != nil { log.Printf("Error executing query: %v", err) return err }
104-154
: Consider using a more appropriate context for database connections inSetup
.Using
context.Background()
for database connections might not be ideal, especially in long-running applications. Consider passing a context that can be canceled or has a timeout.
228-261
: Consider logging missing environment variables inLoadEnvVars
.Logging missing environment variables can help diagnose configuration issues.
if databaseURL == "" { log.Println("DATABASE_URL is not set") return nil, errors.New("DATABASE_URL is not set") } if encryptPassword == "" { log.Println("ENCRYPT_PASSWORD is not set") return nil, errors.New("ENCRYPT_PASSWORD is not set") }
282-297
: Consider expandingCustomStackTraceHandler
to include other files.Currently, the handler targets only
controller.go
. Expanding its scope could improve debugging capabilities.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
node/go.mod
is excluded by!**/*.mod
node/go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
,!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (47)
- .github/workflows/api.test.yaml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/node.test.yaml (1 hunks)
- dockerfiles/orakl-api.Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- node/cmd/api/.version (1 hunks)
- node/cmd/api/main.go (1 hunks)
- node/migrations/api/000001_initialize_tables.down.sql (1 hunks)
- node/migrations/api/000001_initialize_tables.up.sql (1 hunks)
- node/migrations/api/000002_blocks.down.sql (1 hunks)
- node/migrations/api/000002_blocks.up.sql (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/apierr/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/apierr/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/apierr/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/blocks/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/blocks/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/blocks/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/chain/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/chain/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/chain/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/l2aggregator/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/l2aggregator/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/l2aggregator/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/listener/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/listener/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/listener/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/proxy/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/proxy/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/proxy/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/reporter/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/reporter/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/reporter/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/secrets/secrets.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/service/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/service/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/service/route.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/tests/apierr_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/tests/chain_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/tests/listener_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/tests/proxy_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/tests/reporter_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/tests/service_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/tests/vrf_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/utils/custom_types.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/utils/test_helper.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/utils/utils.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/vrf/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/vrf/queries.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/api/vrf/route.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .github/workflows/node.test.yaml
- node/cmd/api/.version
- node/migrations/api/000002_blocks.down.sql
- node/pkg/api/l2aggregator/queries.go
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
node/pkg/api/tests/reporter_test.go (1)
Learnt from: Intizar-T PR: Bisonai/orakl#1902 File: node/pkg/reporter/app_test.go:67-106 Timestamp: 2024-07-25T12:10:57.890Z Learning: Testing edge cases and error handling scenarios is crucial for ensuring the robustness of the application, even if the basic functionality is already verified.
Gitleaks
node/pkg/api/tests/vrf_test.go
28-28: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (73)
node/pkg/api/l2aggregator/route.go (1)
7-10
: Verify the implementation of theget
handler function.Ensure that the
get
function is implemented correctly and includes proper error handling. This is crucial for maintaining reliability and user experience.Verification successful
The
get
function inl2aggregator
is correctly implemented with error handling. The function retrieves parameters, performs database queries, and handles errors appropriately, ensuring reliability and user experience.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `get` function in the l2aggregator package. # Test: Search for the `get` function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation with error handling. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func get($_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 28516
node/pkg/api/apierr/route.go (1)
7-13
: Verify the implementation of the handler functions.Ensure that the
insert
,get
,getById
, anddeleteById
functions are implemented correctly and include proper error handling. This is crucial for maintaining reliability and user experience.Verification successful
Handler Functions Verified Successfully
The handler functions
insert
,get
,getById
, anddeleteById
in theapierr
package are implemented with appropriate error handling. Each function checks for errors during body parsing, validation, and database operations, ensuring reliability and user experience.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the handler functions in the apierr package. # Test: Search for the handler function implementations. Expect: Correct implementations with error handling. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func insert($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func get($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func getById($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func deleteById($_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 88525
node/migrations/api/000002_blocks.up.sql (1)
1-10
: Verify alignment with the data model and consider adding indexes.Ensure that the
observed_blocks
andunprocessed_blocks
tables align with the application's data model. Consider adding indexes on columns that are frequently queried to improve performance.node/pkg/api/vrf/route.go (1)
7-15
: LGTM! Verify handler implementations.The route definitions follow RESTful conventions and are well-organized. Ensure that the handlers (
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
,deleteById
) are implemented correctly.Verification successful
Handler Implementations Verified
The handlers for the VRF routes (
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
,deleteById
) are correctly implemented innode/pkg/api/vrf/controller.go
. This confirms that the route definitions innode/pkg/api/vrf/route.go
are supported by appropriate handler functions.
- Implementations found in
node/pkg/api/vrf/controller.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of route handlers for the VRF module. # Test: Search for handler implementations. Expect: Each handler should be defined. rg --type go 'func (insert|get|getById|updateById|deleteById)\('Length of output: 6818
node/pkg/api/chain/route.go (1)
7-15
: LGTM! Verify handler implementations.The route definitions follow RESTful conventions and are well-organized. Ensure that the handlers (
get
,getById
,insert
,patchById
,deleteById
) are implemented correctly.Verification successful
Handler Implementations Verified for Chain Module
The route handlers (
get
,getById
,insert
,patchById
,deleteById
) for the/chain
routes are correctly implemented innode/pkg/api/chain/controller.go
. This confirms that the route definitions inroute.go
are properly supported by their respective implementations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of route handlers for the Chain module. # Test: Search for handler implementations. Expect: Each handler should be defined. rg --type go 'func (get|getById|insert|patchById|deleteById)\('Length of output: 5910
node/pkg/api/proxy/route.go (1)
7-15
: LGTM! Verify handler implementations.The route definitions follow RESTful conventions and are well-organized. Ensure that the handlers (
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
,deleteById
) are implemented correctly.Verification successful
Handler Implementations Verified for Proxy Module
The route handlers (
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
,deleteById
) for theproxy
module are implemented correctly innode/pkg/api/proxy/controller.go
. The function signatures match the expected pattern. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of route handlers for the Proxy module. # Test: Search for handler implementations. Expect: Each handler should be defined. rg --type go 'func (insert|get|getById|updateById|deleteById)\('Length of output: 6818
node/pkg/api/service/route.go (1)
7-14
: Verify existence of handler functions.Ensure that the handler functions
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
, anddeleteById
are defined and properly implemented in the codebase.Verification successful
Handler functions are correctly defined and implemented.
The handler functions
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
, anddeleteById
are defined in thenode/pkg/api/service/controller.go
file, confirming their existence and implementation for the service routes.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of handler functions for the service routes. # Test: Search for the handler function definitions. Expect: Functions should be defined. rg --type go --pattern 'func (insert|get|getById|updateById|deleteById)\('Length of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of handler functions for the service routes. # Test: Search for the handler function definitions. Expect: Functions should be defined. rg --type go 'func (insert|get|getById|updateById|deleteById)\('Length of output: 6818
node/pkg/api/listener/route.go (1)
7-14
: Verify existence of handler functions.Ensure that the handler functions
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
, anddeleteById
are defined and properly implemented in the codebase.Verification successful
Handler functions are properly implemented.
The handler functions
insert
,get
,getById
,updateById
, anddeleteById
are defined in the codebase, specifically innode/pkg/api/listener/controller.go
. This confirms their existence and proper implementation for the listener routes.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of handler functions for the listener routes. # Test: Search for the handler function definitions. Expect: Functions should be defined. rg --type go --pattern 'func (insert|get|getById|updateById|deleteById)\('Length of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of handler functions for the listener routes. # Test: Search for the handler function definitions. Expect: Functions should be defined. rg --type go 'func (insert|get|getById|updateById|deleteById)\('Length of output: 6818
node/pkg/api/apierr/queries.go (1)
3-10
: Ensure safe usage of SQL queries.Verify that these SQL queries are used with proper parameterization and error handling to prevent SQL injection and manage potential database errors.
Verification successful
SQL Queries are Safely Parameterized and Handled
The SQL queries are used with proper parameterization through
pgx.NamedArgs
, ensuring protection against SQL injection. Additionally, error handling is implemented to manage potential database errors effectively.
QueryRow
andQueryRows
functions correctly utilize parameterized queries and handle errors.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of SQL queries to ensure they are parameterized and safely executed. # Test: Search for the usage of SQL queries. Expect: Queries should be parameterized and safely executed. rg --type go --pattern 'InsertError|GetError|GetErrorById|RemoveErrorById'Length of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of SQL queries to ensure they are parameterized and safely executed. # Corrected test: Search for the usage of SQL queries. Expect: Queries should be parameterized and safely executed. rg 'InsertError|GetError|GetErrorById|RemoveErrorById' --type goLength of output: 1790
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of the utility functions `QueryRow` and `QueryRows` to verify parameter handling. # Search for the implementation of `QueryRow` ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func QueryRow[$$$]($_, $_, $_) ($$, error) { $$$ }' # Search for the implementation of `QueryRows` ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func QueryRows[$$$]($_, $_, $_) ($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 4035
node/pkg/api/reporter/route.go (1)
1-15
: Routes definition looks good!The route definitions are clear and follow RESTful conventions. Ensure that the handler functions (
insert
,get
,getByOracleAddress
, etc.) are implemented and tested properly.Would you like a script to verify the existence of these handler functions in the codebase?
node/pkg/api/blocks/route.go (1)
1-14
: Routes definition is well-structured!The routes for handling
blocks
are well-organized and RESTful. Ensure that the handler functions (getObservedBlock
,upsertObservedBlock
, etc.) are implemented and tested.Would you like a script to verify the existence of these handler functions in the codebase?
node/pkg/api/chain/queries.go (1)
1-14
: SQL queries are well-defined!The SQL queries for the
chains
table are clear and use parameterized queries, which is good for security. Ensure these queries are integrated properly in the application logic and tested.Would you like a script to verify the usage of these queries in the codebase?
node/pkg/api/proxy/queries.go (4)
4-4
: Ensure parameter binding for SQL injection prevention.The
InsertProxy
query uses named parameters, which is good for preventing SQL injection. Ensure that the code executing this query properly binds these parameters.Verification successful
Parameter binding is correctly implemented for the
InsertProxy
query.The
InsertProxy
query is executed using a map of parameters, ensuring proper parameter binding and SQL injection prevention.
node/pkg/api/proxy/controller.go
: Parameters are passed as a map in theQueryRow
function.node/pkg/admin/tests/main_test.go
: Parameters are correctly bound in the test scenario.node/pkg/admin/proxy/controller.go
: Parameters are passed as a map in theQueryRow
function.api/proxy/controller.go
: Parameters are passed as a map in theQueryRow
function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of parameter binding in the codebase for the InsertProxy query. # Test: Search for the InsertProxy query usage. Expect: Proper parameter binding in the code. rg --type go -A 5 $'InsertProxy'Length of output: 2878
17-18
: Ensure proper handling of deletions.The
DeleteProxyById
query deletes a proxy by ID. Ensure that the application logic handles the implications of deletions, such as cascading effects or orphaned records.
8-8
: Verify parameter binding for security.The
GetProxyById
query uses named parameters. Ensure that the code executing this query binds these parameters securely to prevent SQL injection.Verification successful
Parameter binding is secure for the
GetProxyById
query.The
QueryRow
function innode/pkg/api/utils/utils.go
usespgx.NamedArgs(args)
for parameter binding, which is a secure practice against SQL injection. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of parameter binding in the codebase for the GetProxyById query. # Test: Search for the GetProxyById query usage. Expect: Proper parameter binding in the code. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetProxyById'Length of output: 2293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of the QueryRow function to verify secure parameter binding. # Test: Locate the definition of the QueryRow function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func QueryRow[$$$]($_, $_, $_) ($$, $$)'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any function definitions related to QueryRow to verify secure parameter binding. # Test: Locate any function definitions containing "QueryRow" to identify the correct implementation. rg --type go 'func .*QueryRow' -A 10Length of output: 8214
10-14
: Check for concurrency issues with updates.The
UpdateProxyById
query updates a proxy by ID. Ensure that the application logic handles potential concurrency issues, such as lost updates.node/pkg/api/service/queries.go (4)
5-5
: Ensure parameter binding for SQL injection prevention.The
InsertService
query uses named parameters, which is good for preventing SQL injection. Ensure that the code executing this query properly binds these parameters.Verification successful
Parameter binding is correctly implemented for the InsertService query.
The
InsertService
query uses named parameters, and the code incontroller.go
binds these parameters correctly using a map withutils.QueryRow
. This ensures that SQL injection is prevented.
node/pkg/api/service/controller.go
:result, err := utils.QueryRow[ServiceModel](c, InsertService, map[string]any{"name": payload.Name})
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of parameter binding in the codebase for the InsertService query. # Test: Search for the InsertService query usage. Expect: Proper parameter binding in the code. rg --type go -A 5 $'InsertService'Length of output: 3220
17-17
: Verify parameter binding for security.The
GetServiceByName
query uses named parameters. Ensure that the code executing this query binds these parameters securely to prevent SQL injection.Verification successful
Parameter binding for
GetServiceByName
is secure. TheQueryRow
function usespgx.NamedArgs(args)
for executing the query, which securely binds parameters and prevents SQL injection.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of parameter binding in the codebase for the GetServiceByName query. # Test: Search for the GetServiceByName query usage. Expect: Proper parameter binding in the code. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetServiceByName'Length of output: 4923
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate the implementation of utils.QueryRow to ensure secure parameter binding. # Search for the implementation of QueryRow in the utils package. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func QueryRow[$_]($_, $_, $_) ($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 3910
21-21
: Check for concurrency issues with updates.The
UpdateServiceById
query updates a service by ID. Ensure that the application logic handles potential concurrency issues, such as lost updates.
13-13
: Verify parameter binding for security.The
GetServiceById
query uses named parameters. Ensure that the code executing this query binds these parameters securely to prevent SQL injection.Verification successful
Secure Parameter Binding Verified
The
GetServiceById
query usespgx.NamedArgs
for parameter binding, ensuring security against SQL injection. No issues found with the current implementation.
node/pkg/api/utils/utils.go
:QueryRow
function securely binds parameters usingpgx.NamedArgs
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of parameter binding in the codebase for the GetServiceById query. # Test: Search for the GetServiceById query usage. Expect: Proper parameter binding in the code. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetServiceById'Length of output: 1343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of the QueryRow function to verify parameter binding. # Test: Find the implementation of the QueryRow function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func QueryRow[$$$]($_, $_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the QueryRow function to verify parameter binding. # Test: Use ripgrep to find the definition of the QueryRow function in Go files. rg --type go 'func QueryRow'Length of output: 1432
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the QueryRow function from utils.go to verify parameter binding. # Test: Extract the implementation of the QueryRow function in node/pkg/api/utils/utils.go. rg --type go -A 20 'func QueryRow' node/pkg/api/utils/utils.goLength of output: 1027
dockerfiles/orakl-api.Dockerfile (4)
10-10
: Ensure WORKDIR consistency with the new structure.The
WORKDIR /app/node
command updates the working directory to the new structure. Verify that subsequent commands are consistent with this change.
26-26
: Verify the migration files' new path.The
COPY --from=builder /app/node/migrations/api /app/migrations
command updates the path for migration files. Ensure that the new path is correct and contains the necessary migration files.
8-8
: Verify the correctness of the new COPY path.The
COPY node node
command reflects the new directory structure. Ensure that thenode
directory contains all necessary files for the build.Verification successful
The COPY path appears correct and comprehensive.
The
node
directory includes all necessary files for building and running the application, such as Go source files, SQL migrations, and configuration files. TheCOPY node node
command should function as intended for the build process.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the node directory for the build process. # Test: List the contents of the node directory. Expect: All necessary files for the build process. fd --type f --search-path nodeLength of output: 15021
28-28
: Check the binary path for correctness.The
COPY --from=builder /app/node/apibin /usr/bin
command updates the path for the binary. Ensure that the binary is correctly built and copied.node/migrations/api/000001_initialize_tables.down.sql (1)
1-25
: Ensure the order of table drops is correct.The tables are dropped in reverse order of creation, which is a good practice to avoid dependency issues. Ensure that this order matches the actual creation order in your migration scripts.
node/pkg/api/blocks/queries.go (2)
16-21
: Ensure theUpsertObservedBlock
query is efficient.The
ON CONFLICT
clause usesGREATEST
to update the block number. Ensure that this logic is correct and that the index onservice
is properly configured to optimize this operation.
10-13
: Verify theGetObservedBlock
query for correctness.Ensure that the query retrieves the correct columns and that the
service
parameter is properly sanitized and validated.Verification successful
The
GetObservedBlock
query correctly retrieves columns from theobserved_blocks
table.The query uses
SELECT *
to fetch bothservice
andblock_number
, which are the only columns in the table. Theservice
column is uniquely constrained, ensuring data integrity at the database level. Ensure that parameter sanitization and validation are handled in the application logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `GetObservedBlock` query retrieves the correct columns. # Test: Search for the observed_blocks table schema. Expect: Columns should match the query's SELECT statement. rg --type sql 'CREATE TABLE observed_blocks' -A 10Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search for the observed_blocks table schema across all files. # Search for the observed_blocks table definition in any file type. rg 'CREATE TABLE observed_blocks' -A 10Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to the observed_blocks table in migration scripts or other relevant files. # Look for any mention of 'observed_blocks' across all files to find where it might be defined or used. rg 'observed_blocks'Length of output: 1088
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the schema of the observed_blocks table from the migration script. # Display the schema definition from the migration script for the observed_blocks table. rg 'CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "observed_blocks"' -A 10Length of output: 1364
node/cmd/api/main.go (2)
1-19
: Imports look good.The imports are well-organized and necessary for the functionality provided in this file.
39-57
: Server initialization and port handling look good.The logic for setting the port and starting the server is correct. Ensure that the deferred closing of resources is appropriate for your use case.
node/pkg/api/vrf/queries.go (6)
4-9
:InsertVrf
query looks good.The query uses parameterized inputs, which helps prevent SQL injection. Ensure that the fields and table names are correct.
11-16
:GetVrf
query looks good.The query correctly joins with the
chains
table. Ensure the chain ID parameter is validated in the calling code.
18-22
:GetVrfWithoutChainId
query looks good.The query retrieves all VRF keys without filtering. Ensure this broad query is necessary and used appropriately.
24-29
:GetVrfById
query looks good.The query uses a limit of 1, which is appropriate. Ensure the ID parameter is validated in the calling code.
31-37
:UpdateVrfById
query looks good.The query uses parameterized inputs, which helps prevent SQL injection. Ensure that the fields and table names are correct.
39-42
:DeleteVrfById
query looks good.The query uses parameterized inputs, which helps prevent SQL injection. Ensure that the fields and table names are correct.
.github/workflows/api.test.yaml (3)
8-8
: Path adjustments look good.The paths have been correctly updated to reflect the new structure under
node/pkg/api/**
.
48-56
: Directory changes for commands look good.The commands have been updated to operate within the
node
directory, ensuring the correct context for operations.
59-64
: Testing steps and environment variables look good.The testing steps and environment variables are set up correctly for the new structure.
node/pkg/api/chain/controller.go (1)
39-45
: LGTM!The
get
function is well-implemented and uses utility functions effectively.node/pkg/api/service/controller.go (1)
38-44
: LGTM!The
get
function is well-implemented and uses utility functions effectively.node/pkg/api/secrets/secrets.go (1)
64-77
: LGTM!The
GetSecret
function is well-implemented and handles fallbacks to environment variables effectively.node/pkg/api/tests/chain_test.go (1)
14-68
: Tests are well-structured but consider adding more assertions.The test suite for the
chain
API is well-organized and covers basic CRUD operations. However, consider adding assertions to verify the HTTP status codes and more detailed checks on the response data to ensure comprehensive test coverage.node/pkg/api/tests/service_test.go (1)
14-68
: Tests are well-structured but consider adding more assertions.The test suite for the
service
API is well-organized and covers basic CRUD operations. As with thechain
tests, consider adding assertions for HTTP status codes and more detailed checks on the response data to ensure comprehensive test coverage.node/pkg/api/listener/queries.go (1)
12-44
: SQL query constants are well-structured.The SQL query constants for
listeners
are well-organized and follow best practices for readability and maintainability.node/pkg/api/apierr/controller.go (1)
54-60
: LGTM!The
get
function is well-implemented. It retrieves all error records and handles errors appropriately.node/pkg/api/proxy/controller.go (1)
48-55
: LGTM!The
get
function is well-implemented. It retrieves all proxy records and handles errors appropriately.node/pkg/api/tests/apierr_test.go (1)
16-76
: Overall test structure is well-organized.The test covers the essential CRUD operations for the error API, ensuring that the API behaves as expected. The use of
testify
for assertions enhances readability and maintainability.node/pkg/api/reporter/queries.go (1)
13-41
: Good use of parameterized queries for SQL constants.The SQL constants use parameterized queries, which is a best practice for preventing SQL injection and ensuring query safety.
node/pkg/api/blocks/controller.go (3)
19-26
: Effective use of custom validators.The custom validation for non-negative integers is a good approach to ensure data integrity. Consider adding more context-specific validation rules if needed.
50-68
: Consistent error handling and response structure.The function handles errors consistently and returns JSON responses, which is a good practice for API endpoints.
104-116
: Ensure consistent parameter validation.The
deleteUnprocessedBlock
function should validate theservice
andblockNumber
parameters to ensure they are not empty or invalid before proceeding with the query.// Example: Add parameter validation checks if service == "" || blockNumber == "" { return fiber.NewError(fiber.StatusBadRequest, "service and blockNumber parameters are required") }node/pkg/api/utils/test_helper.go (5)
60-62
: LGTM!The
GetRequest
function is correctly implemented as a wrapper for GET requests.
64-66
: LGTM!The
PostRequest
function is correctly implemented as a wrapper for POST requests.
68-70
: LGTM!The
PatchRequest
function is correctly implemented as a wrapper for PATCH requests.
72-74
: LGTM!The
DeleteRequest
function is correctly implemented as a wrapper for DELETE requests.
128-141
: LGTM!The
DeepCopyMap
function is correctly implemented and handles errors appropriately.node/pkg/api/tests/vrf_test.go (1)
28-28
: Address potential security issue with API key.A generic API key is detected, which could expose sensitive operations. Ensure that this key is not used in production or replace it with a secure method of handling sensitive information.
Verification successful
Ensure test keys are not used in production.
The key "ebeb5229570725793797e30a426d7ef8aca79d38ff330d7d1f28485d2366de32" appears in test files. Confirm that these files are not included in production builds or deployments to avoid potential security risks.
node/pkg/api/tests/vrf_test.go
api/tests/vrf_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of sensitive information in the codebase. # Test: Search for potential API keys or sensitive information. rg 'ebeb5229570725793797e30a426d7ef8aca79d38ff330d7d1f28485d2366de32'Length of output: 491
Tools
Gitleaks
28-28: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
node/migrations/api/000001_initialize_tables.up.sql (3)
42-49
: Use appropriate data types for large values.The
value
column in theaggregates
table is of typeBIGINT
. Ensure this type is appropriate for the expected range of values, as it can affect storage and performance.
60-69
: Ensure referential integrity with ON DELETE actions.The
data
table has foreign keys withON DELETE CASCADE
. Verify that this behavior is intended, as it will delete related data in this table when referenced rows in theaggregators
orfeeds
tables are deleted.
81-90
: Verify the length constraints for address fields.In the
listeners
table, theaddress
field is defined asCHARACTER VARYING(42)
. Ensure that this length is appropriate for all expected address formats.node/pkg/api/utils/custom_types.go (8)
33-35
: Ensure consistent error handling in JSON methods.The
MarshalJSON
method forCustomFloat
is straightforward, but ensure that any potential errors are handled consistently across all custom types.
63-65
: Ensure consistent JSON marshaling.The
MarshalJSON
method forCustomBool
is consistent withCustomFloat
. Ensure this consistency is maintained across all custom types.
88-90
: Ensure consistent JSON marshaling.The
MarshalJSON
method forCustomInt32
is consistent with other custom types. This consistency is good for maintainability.
126-128
: Ensure consistent string conversion.The
String
method forCustomInt64
is straightforward and consistent with Go's idioms.
130-133
: Ensure consistent JSON marshaling.The
MarshalJSON
method forCustomInt64
is consistent with other custom types, which is good for maintainability.
169-172
: Ensure consistent string conversion.The
String
method forCustomDateTime
is consistent with Go's idioms and formats the date correctly.
174-176
: Ensure consistent JSON marshaling.The
MarshalJSON
method forCustomDateTime
is consistent with other custom types, which is good for maintainability.
219-234
: Ensure robust date parsing.The
tryParsingRFC3339Milli
andtryParsingRFC3339
functions handle date parsing well. Ensure that any additional formats used in the system are also supported.node/pkg/api/utils/utils.go (5)
3-25
: Imports look good.The imported packages are relevant to the functionalities implemented in this file.
27-30
: Type definition is appropriate.The
AppConfig
struct is a suitable container for application configuration.
66-83
:QueryRow
is well-implemented.The function correctly handles single-row queries and uses generics effectively.
85-102
:QueryRows
is well-implemented.The function correctly handles multi-row queries and uses generics effectively.
263-280
:CustomErrorHandler
is well-implemented.The function provides effective error handling and logging.
@coderabbitai resolve |
eb35b53
to
d54fbb1
Compare
@coderabbitai resolve |
Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
d54fbb1
to
3e43cf0
Compare
Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
Description
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment