(Chore) cleanup debug logs added to solve reporter issue #1970
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes streamline the codebase by removing the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Collector
participant Aggregator
participant Reporter
User->>Collector: Send Incoming Data
Collector->>Aggregator: Process Incoming Data
Aggregator->>Reporter: Check for Deviating Aggregates
Reporter-->>Aggregator: Return Results
Aggregator-->>Collector: Send Processed Data
Collector-->>User: Deliver Response
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- node/pkg/aggregator/types.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/aggregator/utils.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/dal/collector/collector.go (2 hunks)
- node/pkg/reporter/reporter.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- node/pkg/aggregator/utils.go
- node/pkg/dal/collector/collector.go
- node/pkg/reporter/reporter.go
Additional comments not posted (1)
node/pkg/aggregator/types.go (1)
Line range hint
33-36:
LGTM! But verify the removal ofPublishTimefield.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that the removal of the
PublishTimefield does not affect other parts of the codebase.Verification successful
Removal of
PublishTimefield verifiedThe
PublishTimefield has been successfully removed from theSubmissionDatastruct, and no occurrences ofPublishTimewere found in the codebase. TheSubmissionDatastruct is widely used, and its integrity is maintained after the removal.
- No occurrences of
PublishTimefound in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the `PublishTime` field from the `SubmissionData` struct. # Test: Search for the usage of the `PublishTime` field. Expect: No occurrences of `PublishTime`. rg --type go 'PublishTime'Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the removal of the `PublishTime` field from the `SubmissionData` struct. # Test 1: Search for the usage of the `PublishTime` field across the entire codebase. Expect: No occurrences of `PublishTime`. rg 'PublishTime' # Test 2: Search for the usage of the `SubmissionData` struct to ensure its integrity after the removal of the `PublishTime` field. rg 'SubmissionData'Length of output: 11026
Description
related delays will be caught from sentinel
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment