-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
generate keccak256 mappings from sol errors #1522
generate keccak256 mappings from sol errors #1522
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe enhancements in Changes
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
contracts/v0.1/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/errorMappings.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (1)
- contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Biome (5)
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js (5)
1-1: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.
2-2: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.
10-27: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
18-21: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
36-43: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
Additional comments not posted (1)
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js (1)
48-49
: The usage of themapping
constant to store and write the keccak256 mappings is correctly implemented.
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
please check lint error from github action
|
just pushed a fix commit :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!, left minor comments
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ | |||
{ | |||
"TooManyConsumers()": "05a48e0fc42b9cfeed3601aff0cfc0d560d245d28de6c384623d71dc535c2272", | |||
"MustBeRequestedOwner(address)": "d084e975a962ac435d13cd622ad247f5a0482af4cce640e1af8dc9e5e88a9c36", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's probably gonna have different hash if address is replaced with specific value, did you also check the case? would it be still recognizable with this hash value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just a suggestion, but how about making a yarn command taking hash and return decoded custom error using related library?
i found this kind of answer in stackoverflow
https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/a/153295
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
regarding, hash correctness, i found the following piece:
In Solidity, the error signature is generated from its name and the types of its parameters. The parameter names are not included in the signature. This is similar to how function signatures are generated in Solidity.
The signature is then hashed using the Keccak256 algorithm to produce a 4-byte identifier. This identifier is what's used in the bytecode to represent the error.
so as long as the error definitions dont change the encoding/hash won't change. And if the error def changes, we can always generate updated hashes by running this script. Pls let me know if I misunderstood your point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
awh I see, think I misunderstood how hashes were generated. thank you for the explanation.
still, it'd be nice to have if we can parse the data together if there's a parameter in the error 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes that'd be great! I'm currently testing out the library that you suggested, ethers-decode-error
, from vrf-consumer script but I keep running into errors when I try to initialize the decoder (it's failing to parse the passed abi) or cannot parse the error if no abi is passed. Maybe we can take a quick look together on Monday :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
contracts/v0.1/package.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/errorMappings.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (2)
- contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js (1 hunks)
- contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/get-error-from-encoding.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/error-keccak-mapping.js
Additional Context Used
Biome (1)
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/get-error-from-encoding.js (1)
1-1: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/get-error-from-encoding.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/get-error-from-encoding.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/get-error-from-encoding.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- contracts/v0.1/scripts/sol-error-mappings/get-error-from-encoding.js
Description
Processes all .sol files in contracts/v0.1/src and generate keccak256 encoding from error function definitions. This error to encoding mapping will prove useful for debugging contract errors.
Note: error function definition params are processed to remove param names and only leave types. I've confirmed the validity of generated encodings using
chisel
.Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment