(OraklNode) update id types from node admin #1521
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes across multiple files primarily involve updating the data types of various ID fields from Changes
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- node/pkg/admin/config/controller.go (4 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/feed/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/providerUrl/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/proxy/controller.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/aggregator_test.go (2 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/config_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/feed_test.go (2 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/fetcher_test.go (2 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/providerUrl_test.go (1 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/proxy_test.go (3 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/wallet_test.go (5 hunks)
- node/pkg/admin/wallet/controller.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- node/pkg/admin/tests/aggregator_test.go
- node/pkg/admin/tests/fetcher_test.go
Additional comments not posted (16)
node/pkg/admin/feed/controller.go (1)
11-11: Updated data types forIdandConfigIdfromint64toint32align with PR objectives to standardize ID types across the system.Also applies to: 14-14
node/pkg/admin/tests/feed_test.go (1)
36-36: Updated test cases to usestrconv.Itoafor ID conversion align with the changes in data types fromint64toint32.Also applies to: 52-52
node/pkg/admin/providerUrl/controller.go (1)
10-10: Updated data type forIdfromint64toint32inProviderUrlModelaligns with PR objectives to standardize ID types across the system.node/pkg/admin/tests/providerUrl_test.go (1)
77-77: Updated test case to usestrconv.Itoafor ID conversion aligns with the changes in data types fromint64toint32.node/pkg/admin/proxy/controller.go (1)
10-10: Updated data type forIdfromint64toint32inProxyModelaligns with PR objectives to standardize ID types across the system.node/pkg/admin/tests/config_test.go (1)
45-45: Updated test case to usestrconv.Itoafor ID conversion aligns with the changes in data types fromint64toint32.node/pkg/admin/tests/proxy_test.go (4)
79-79: Ensure the ID conversion fromint64toint32is handled correctly in all test cases.
152-152: Confirm that the retrieval of a proxy by ID after deletion correctly returns a nil result, reflecting the updated ID type.
147-147: Check the delete functionality with the new ID type to ensure it's functioning as expected.Verification successful
To verify the delete functionality with the new ID type, we need to inspect the
DeleteRequestfunction definition and the ID type used in theproxy_test.gofile. This will help us ensure that the ID conversion is handled correctly.
The
DeleteRequestfunction is defined in multiple places, and it appears to be a generic function that handles DELETE requests. In theproxy_test.gofile, the ID is being converted to a string usingstrconv.Itoa(int(*insertResult.Id)), which suggests that the ID is of a pointer type that can be dereferenced to an integer.Given this context, it seems that the ID type is being handled correctly in the
DeleteRequestfunction. The conversion to a string usingstrconv.Itoais appropriate for an integer ID type.
DeleteRequestfunction definition:
node/pkg/admin/tests/test_helper.go:87delegator/utils/test_helper.go:111api/utils/test_helper.go:72ID usage in
proxy_test.go:
strconv.Itoa(int(*insertResult.Id))The delete functionality with the new ID type appears to be functioning as expected.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the delete request handles the new ID type correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go $'DeleteRequest'Length of output: 6062
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the DeleteRequest function and the ID type used in proxy_test.go. # Step 1: Get the definition of the DeleteRequest function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func DeleteRequest[T any](app *fiber.App, endpoint string, requestBody interface{}) (T, error)' # Step 2: Check the ID type used in proxy_test.go. rg --type go 'Id' node/pkg/admin/tests/proxy_test.goLength of output: 1904
114-114: Verify that the updated ID type does not affect the patch request functionality.Verification successful
The
PatchRequestfunction relies on thereqfunction, which handles the HTTP request and response processing. Thereqfunction appears to correctly handle the request body and endpoint, ensuring that the ID type conversion should not cause issues. Additionally, the test cases that usePatchRequestare comprehensive and cover various scenarios.
PatchRequestfunction definitions:
node/pkg/admin/tests/test_helper.godelegator/utils/test_helper.goapi/utils/test_helper.go
reqfunction definitions:
node/pkg/admin/tests/test_helper.godelegator/utils/test_helper.goapi/utils/test_helper.goTest cases using
PatchRequest:
TestProxyInsertTestProxyGetTestProxyGetByIdTestProxyUpdateByIdTestProxyDeleteByIdTestWalletInsertTestWalletGetTestWalletGetAddressTestWalletGetByIdTestWalletUpdateByIdTestWalletDeleteByIdTestFunctionReadTestFunctionReadSingleTestFunctionInsertTestFunctionUpdateTestFunctionDeleteTestReporterReadTestReporterReadSingleTestReporterInsertTestReporterUpdateTestReporterDeleteTestOrganizationReadTestOrganizationReadSingleTestOrganizationInsertTestOrganizationUpdateTestOrganizationDeleteTestContractReadTestContractInsertTestContractReadSingleTestContractUpdateTestContractDeleteTestConnectReporterTestVrfTestServiceTestReporterTestProxyTestListenerTestChainTestAggregatorTestAggregateGiven the comprehensive test coverage and the correct handling of the request in the
reqfunction, the updated ID type should not affect the patch request functionality.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the patch request handles the new ID type correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go $'PatchRequest'Length of output: 2845
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the definitions of the PatchRequest function ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func PatchRequest[T any](app *fiber.App, endpoint string, requestBody interface{}) (T, error) { $$$ }' # List the test cases that use PatchRequest to verify their coverage rg --type go 'PatchRequest' --files-with-matches | xargs -I {} rg --type go 'func Test' {}Length of output: 2566
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the definition of the req function ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func req[T any](app *fiber.App, method string, endpoint string, requestBody interface{}) (T, error) { $$$ }' # List the test cases that use PatchRequest to verify their coverage rg --type go 'PatchRequest' --files-with-matches | xargs -I '{}' rg --type go 'func Test' '{}'Length of output: 7933
node/pkg/admin/wallet/controller.go (1)
13-13: The update fromint64toint32in the WalletModel struct is consistent with the PR objectives to standardize ID types across the system.node/pkg/admin/tests/wallet_test.go (4)
45-45: Ensure the retrieval of a wallet by ID reflects the updated ID type without affecting functionality.
99-99: Confirm that the get by ID functionality correctly handles the new ID type, especially in edge cases like invalid IDs.
152-152: Verify the delete functionality and subsequent retrieval attempt with the new ID type to ensure correct behavior.Also applies to: 164-164
125-125: Check the update functionality with the new ID type to ensure it's functioning as expected.Also applies to: 130-130
Verification successful
The
PatchRequestfunction is used in multiple test files, includingwallet_test.go. To ensure the update functionality with the new ID type is functioning as expected, we need to verify thePatchRequestfunction definition and its usage inwallet_test.go.Let's inspect the
PatchRequestfunction definition and its usage inwallet_test.goto ensure it handles the new ID type correctly.
The
PatchRequestfunction is defined in multiple files and is used inwallet_test.goto update a wallet. The function signature and its usage inwallet_test.goappear to be consistent with the new ID type.
The
PatchRequestfunction is defined as:func PatchRequest[T any](app *fiber.App, endpoint string, requestBody interface{}) (T, error) { return req[T](app, "PATCH", endpoint, requestBody) }In
wallet_test.go, the function is used as follows:updateResult, err := PatchRequest[wallet.WalletModel](testItems.app, "/api/v1/wallet/"+strconv.Itoa(int(*testItems.tmpData.wallet.Id)), map[string]any{"pk": mockWallet.Pk}) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("error updating wallet: %v", err) }The usage of
PatchRequestinwallet_test.gocorrectly handles the new ID type by converting the ID to a string usingstrconv.Itoa(int(*testItems.tmpData.wallet.Id)).No issues were found with the update functionality regarding the new ID type.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the update request handles the new ID type correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go $'PatchRequest'Length of output: 2845
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the PatchRequest function and its usage in wallet_test.go. # 1. Get the definition of the PatchRequest function. # 2. Get the relevant lines from wallet_test.go where PatchRequest is used. # Get the definition of the PatchRequest function rg --type go --context 5 'func PatchRequest' # Get the relevant lines from wallet_test.go where PatchRequest is used rg --type go --context 5 'PatchRequest' node/pkg/admin/tests/wallet_test.goLength of output: 3007
node/pkg/admin/config/controller.go (1)
22-22: The updates to the ID types in various models and the map in the Sync function are consistent with the PR objectives and should help standardize ID handling across the system.Also applies to: 34-34, 43-43, 106-106
|
seems like there is int8 in go as well. I'm wondering why not scale it down to int8 if the id type in psql is int4 |
the possible number range for pgsql int4 is equal to golang int32 but golang int8 can represent numbers only in range between -128 to 127, so it's not compatible |
Description
ID's data type in PGSQL is int4 which could be represented as int32 type in golang.
This PR updates the types and unifies with other packages (fetcher, aggregator, and reporter)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment