-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add UDR option to route spoke traffic internally #171
Conversation
Thank you so much @simonkurtz-MSFT for putting this together. Can you also please update the documentation with the new parameter that's added at the following documents: So that users know they can change the LZA behavior? Also, this needs to be implemented at the terraform side as well so that there's feature parity between implementations. Can you work on this too or should we assign someone else for it? |
Hi @kpantos, thank you! I added to the standalone-deployment-guide but I did not see a section in the spoke deployment. I would love to ask for help with Terraform as that is entirely out of my expertise, please. |
Hi @kpantos, the most recent commit now supports internal routes when multiple VNet address prefixes are used. I validated these three combinations. 1. No internal routes
2. One internal route
3. Multiple internal routes
|
scenarios/aca-internal/bicep/modules/02-spoke/deploy.spoke.bicep
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Awesome @simonkurtz-MSFT merged the pull request to the main branch. |
Running bicep via AZD with
routeSpokeTrafficInternally
set tofalse
(default) causes no change and maintains current behavior:Running bicep via AZD with
routeSpokeTrafficInternally
set totrue
adds a new spoke-internal route:Fixes #170