Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Space - Antonia #47

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

antoniairizarry
Copy link

Media Ranker

Congratulations! You're submitting your assignment!

Comprehension Questions

Question Answer
Describe a custom model method you wrote. I wrote methods dealing with the homepage display in the Work model, mostly regarding sorting works by amount of votes.
Describe how you approached testing that model method. What edge cases did you come up with?
What are session and flash? What is the difference between them? In sessions the browser stores information while you're logged in, so you can use certain functionalities. Flash is a message that will show up confirming an action or giving a warning.
What was one thing that you gained more clarity on through this assignment? Migrations. As I was going along I hit a few bumps.
What is the Heroku URL of your deployed application? https://desolate-anchorage-11807.herokuapp.com/

@kaidamasaki
Copy link

kaidamasaki commented Jun 2, 2020

Media Ranker

Functional Requirements: Manual Testing

Criteria yes/no
Before logging in --
1. On index page, there are at most 10 pieces of media on three lists, and a Media Spotlight ✔️
2. Can go into a work's show page ✔️
3. Verify unable to vote on a work, and get a flash message ✔️
4. Can edit this work successfully, and get a flash message Editing doesn’t fill in existing data and saving shows an error.
5. Can go to "View all media" page and see three lists of works, sorted by vote ✔️
6. Verify unable to create a new work when the form is empty, and details about the validation errors are visible to the user through a flash message It is possible to save a new work without entering any information.
7. Can create a new work successfully. Note the URL for this work's show page ✔️
8. Can delete this work successfully ✔️
9. Going back to the URL of this deleted work's show page produces a 404 or some redirect behavior (and does not try to produce a broken view) ✔️
10. Verify that the "View all users" page lists no users ✔️
Log in --
11. Logging in with a valid name changes the UI to "Logged in as" and "Logout" buttons ✔️
12. Your username is listed in "View all users" page ✔️
13. Verify that number of votes determines the Media Spotlight ✔️
14. Voting on several different pieces of media affects the "Votes" tables shown in the work's show page and the user's show page ✔️
15. Voting on the same work twice produces an error and flash message, and there is no extra vote ✔️
Log out --
16. Logging out showed a flash message and changed the UI ✔️
17. Logging in as a new user creates a new user ✔️
18. Logging in as an already existing user has a specific flash message ✔️

Major Learning Goals/Code Review

Criteria yes/no
1. Sees the full development cycle including deployment, and the app is deployed to Heroku ✔️
2. Practices full-stack development and fulfilling story requirements: the styling, look, and feel of the app is similar to the original Media Ranker Substantial differences from the original project.
3. Practices git with at least 25 small commits and meaningful commit messages Only 19 commits.

Previous Rails learning, Building Complex Model Logic, DRYing up Rails Code

Criteria yes/no
4. Routes file uses resources for works ✔️
5. Routes file shows intention in limiting routes for voting, log-in functionality, and users All resources have all actions.
6. The homepage view, all media view, and new works view use semantic HTML Homepage has several markup errors.
7. The homepage view, all media view, and new works view use partials when appropriate No partials used.
8. The model for media (likely named work.rb) has_many votes ✔️
9. The model for media has methods to describe business logic, specifically for top ten and top media, possibly also for getting works by some category ✔️
10. Some controller, likely the ApplicationController, has a controller filter for finding a logged in user No controller filters used.
11. Some controller, likely the WorksController, has a controller filter for finding a work No controller filters used.
12. The WorksController uses strong params ✔️
13. The WorksController's code style is clean, and focused on working with requests, responses, params, session, flash ✔️

Testing Rails Apps

Criteria yes/no
14. There are valid fixtures files used for users, votes, and works No tests.
15. User model has tests with sections on validations (valid and invalid) and relationships (has votes) No tests.
16. Vote model has tests with sections on validations (valid and invalid) and relationships (belongs to a user, belongs to a vote) No tests.
17. Work model has tests with sections on validations (valid and invalid) and relationships (has votes) No tests.
18. Work model has tests with a section on all business logic methods in the model, including their edge cases No tests.

Overall Feedback

Overall Feedback Criteria yes/no
Green (Meets/Exceeds Standards) 14+ in Functional Requirements: Manual Testing && 14+ in Code Review
Yellow (Approaches Standards) 12+ in Functional Requirements: Manual Testing && 11+ in Code Review, or the instructor judges that this project needs special attention
Red (Not at Standard) 0-10 in Code Review or 0-11 in Functional Reqs, or assignment is breaking/doesn’t run with less than 5 minutes of debugging, or the instructor judges that this project needs special attention ✔️

Code Style Bonus Awards

Was the code particularly impressive in code style for any of these reasons (or more...?)

Quality Yes?
Perfect Indentation
Elegant/Clever
Descriptive/Readable
Concise
Logical/Organized

Copy link

@kaidamasaki kaidamasaki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good effort!

It looks like you really struggled with some of the code requirements though. Specifically using newer features like partials and views and also with doing testing.

You did manage to get almost all of the functionality built in though, so well done on that front.

Comment on lines +13 to +26
<section class="top-ten__container">
<section class="top-ten__list-container">
<h2 class="top-ten__header">Top Albums</h2>
<ul class="list-group top-ten__list">
<% Work.top_ten("album").each do |work| %>
<h4><%= link_to work.title, work_path(work.id)%></h4>
<p>by <%= work.artist%></p>
<p> <%= work.votes.count %> votes</p>
<br>
<% end %>
</div>
</section>
</ul>
</div>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something funky is going on with your tags here.

<ul>s should contain <li>s not a mix of tags and your closing tags are scrambled and you have closing tags for two <div>s that aren't open. It looks like maybe a conversion of <div>s into <sections> that only made it halfway.

Suggested change
<section class="top-ten__container">
<section class="top-ten__list-container">
<h2 class="top-ten__header">Top Albums</h2>
<ul class="list-group top-ten__list">
<% Work.top_ten("album").each do |work| %>
<h4><%= link_to work.title, work_path(work.id)%></h4>
<p>by <%= work.artist%></p>
<p> <%= work.votes.count %> votes</p>
<br>
<% end %>
</div>
</section>
</ul>
</div>
<section class="top-ten__container">
<section class="top-ten__list-container">
<h2 class="top-ten__header">Top Albums</h2>
<ul class="list-group top-ten__list">
<% Work.top_ten("album").each do |work| %>
<li>
<h4><%= link_to work.title, work_path(work.id)%></h4>
<p>by <%= work.artist%></p>
<p> <%= work.votes.count %> votes</p>
</li>
<% end %>
</ul>
</section>
</section>

</thead>
<tbody>
<% @user.votes.each do |vote|%>
<% work = Work.find_by(id: vote.work_id) %>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should use vote.work instead of doing a find_by here:

Suggested change
<% work = Work.find_by(id: vote.work_id) %>
<% work = vote.work %>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants