You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that when a transaction change from calculated to transmitted or from transmitted to mempool the date/time of the Value Transfer is the same... From the UX perspective would be really good if the date/time changed/updated as well...
This way the new (confirming) value transfers always are on the top of the list, and this is less confusing to the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm working on Safe Communication and this problem is more obvious, because User 1 send a message to User 2 and User 2 reply with another message fast, and both are in the mempool... but the order is wrong attending the date of the transactions.
And if we want to do this properly, we need another stored date which is the moment when the tx enter in the mempool, because the actual date is when the tx is confirmed, and some txs take more time to confirm than others... and the Users see the messages in wrong order.
Perhaps to avoid these problems you should wait for the transaction to be confirmed before enabling the Reply option, remember that a transaction in mempool does not guarantee that it will be confirmed.
It would be great to be able to reply quickly to each message to make it as close to instant messaging as possible, but taking into account the above, I think we should prevent the user from replying until there is a confirmation.
Still, I agree that the underlying bug reported above should be fixed. @juanky201271@zancas
I noticed that when a transaction change from
calculated
totransmitted
or fromtransmitted
tomempool
the date/time of the Value Transfer is the same... From the UX perspective would be really good if the date/time changed/updated as well...This way the new (confirming) value transfers always are on the top of the list, and this is less confusing to the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: