You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider the user deploying via on the Gateway 2000 mentioned in the comments of #51. I think a multi-threaded first approach is something that will stay long term provided the community responds well to it.
I do recognize the potential of a web server framework as lightweight as Via being beneficial for use in embedded devices or recycled hardware. With that being said–offering a feature flag that removes some Send + Sync requirements, avoiding unnecessary clones and / or atomic operations is something we should prioritize.
While this may sound more performant that our current approach. It is only an optimization for users deploying their server to hardware with a single CPU core or older processors that do not support optimized instructions for atomic operations. We'll likely want to introduce tracing a benchmark the multi-threaded version extensively before starting any work here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Consider the user deploying via on the Gateway 2000 mentioned in the comments of #51. I think a multi-threaded first approach is something that will stay long term provided the community responds well to it.
I do recognize the potential of a web server framework as lightweight as Via being beneficial for use in embedded devices or recycled hardware. With that being said–offering a feature flag that removes some
Send + Sync
requirements, avoiding unnecessary clones and / or atomic operations is something we should prioritize.While this may sound more performant that our current approach. It is only an optimization for users deploying their server to hardware with a single CPU core or older processors that do not support optimized instructions for atomic operations. We'll likely want to introduce tracing a benchmark the multi-threaded version extensively before starting any work here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: