Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple patch files not the same as a combined patch file. #20

Open
mrudat opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #21
Open

Multiple patch files not the same as a combined patch file. #20

mrudat opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #21

Comments

@mrudat
Copy link

mrudat commented May 14, 2020

At present, there is a distinction between:

  • zPatch.esp
    • Patcher 1
    • Patcher 2

and:

  • zPatch.esp
    • Patcher 1
  • zPatch2.esp
    • Patcher 2

The difference being that if Patcher 1 adds a new record, in the first scenario, that record will not be visible to Patcher 2, while in the second scenario it will not.

This is arguably a bug, as the documentation suggests that there should be no distinction between the two scenarios, other than the second one consuming two entries in the user's load order.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant