You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a way to circumvent this? Is this intended?
I am still wondering, if running wfmash in all versus all mapping mode on all sample at once will give the equivalent results to running wfmash in all versus all mapping mode for each prefix in the given sequences.
Thanks for any tips!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wfmash_map_0110_ecoli_2146_s5k_p90.BL21-Gold(DE3)pLysS_AG_f399789#1#NC_012947.1.time:[mashmap::skch::Sketch::computeFreqHist] No minmers.
wfmash_map_0110_ecoli_2146_s5k_p90.clone_D_i14_e789781#1#NC_017652.1.time:[mashmap::skch::Sketch::computeFreqHist] No minmers.
wfmash_map_0110_ecoli_2146_s5k_p90.clone_D_i2_32d971c#1#NC_017651.1.time:[mashmap::skch::Sketch::computeFreqHist] No minmers.
I was trying to use wfmash in mapping mode to generate all versus all mappings of 2k
e. coli
. @AndreaGuarracino you already have the FASTA.However, when no minmers are found, I get a signal 8:
Is there a way to circumvent this? Is this intended?
I am still wondering, if running wfmash in all versus all mapping mode on all sample at once will give the equivalent results to running wfmash in all versus all mapping mode for each prefix in the given sequences.
Thanks for any tips!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: