Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish crates to crates.io #38

Open
drskalman opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Publish crates to crates.io #38

drskalman opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@drskalman
Copy link
Collaborator

We want to publish common and ring but we need a better name for them. It was suggested that common be renamed to w3f-plonk-common. and ring should also probably rename to something like ring-proof.

@davxy
Copy link
Collaborator

davxy commented Oct 25, 2024

To publish these you first need to publish fflonk I guess

But please, let's first address #36

In JAM we're also using a feature from my fork to produce test-vectors. If we switch to crates.io we need it there as well. I'll propose a PR after #36 is merged

@drskalman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I started this meanwhile, till we settle remaining issues.

@shawntabrizi
Copy link

Hey! I am representing the proof of personhood team for parity/polkadot and would like to note that recently our stuff is broken because of updates from the github repos.

publishing the crates would probably solve this, allowing us to keep our projects working against a specific version

@swasilyev
Copy link
Collaborator

A part of #36 went to #44 and #45. I didn't merge anything test-vectors related though.

@shawntabrizi
Copy link

shawntabrizi commented Dec 9, 2024

@swasilyev how to get in contact with you? right now https://github.com/w3f/ring-vrf
is broken, because you recently bumped all the ark-xx crates from 0.4 to 0.5 or something.

We need versioning, crate publishing, and @swasilyev if you can fix things asap in their current state, that would be very helpful.

cc @georgepisaltu

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants