-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new spec: Accessibility Object Model #1654
Labels
new spec
Suggestion to add a new spec
Comments
Changes to
|
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2025
Close #1654, adding the suggested spec to the list. ### Changes to `index.json` This update would trigger the following changes in `index.json`: <details><summary>Add spec (1)</summary> ```json { "url": "https://wicg.github.io/aom/spec/", "seriesComposition": "full", "shortname": "aom", "series": { "shortname": "aom", "currentSpecification": "aom", "title": "Accessibility Object Model", "shortTitle": "Accessibility Object Model", "nightlyUrl": "https://wicg.github.io/aom/spec/" }, "organization": "W3C", "groups": [ { "name": "Web Platform Incubator Community Group", "url": "https://www.w3.org/community/wicg/" } ], "nightly": { "url": "https://wicg.github.io/aom/spec/", "status": "Unofficial Proposal Draft", "alternateUrls": [], "repository": "https://github.com/WICG/aom", "sourcePath": "spec/index.html", "filename": "index.html" }, "title": "Accessibility Object Model", "source": "spec", "shortTitle": "Accessibility Object Model", "categories": [ "browser" ], "standing": "pending" } ``` </details> ### Tests These changes look good! 😎
(Sigh, I had forgotten that there's something to fix in the job first. Will look into it) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
URL
https://wicg.github.io/aom/spec/
Rationale
I'm trying to have browser-specs become the source of all WICG entries for Specref, and a WICG entry already exists in Specref for
AOM
. Adding it with a "pending" standing (spec status is "Unofficial Proposal Draft") should not create particular issues, especially since the spec remains more of a placeholder than an actual spec.Additional properties
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: