-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversion to Es6 #6
Comments
Currently I'm trying to limit my use of es6 to what is supported by node.js and the most popular browsers. The main reason for this is to keep the tool-chain requirements minimalistic (this is the philosophy i've maintained for all the @voltraco work, so far) That said, there might things that can be brought up to date? |
Yes, we can use features that do not break the compatibility, like arrow function, class, conts, let etc ... are simple changes that will make the syntax leaner and improve the performance of the plugin, what do you think? If you'd rather not for me without problems. |
Huge +1 👍 |
Beauty in a few weeks I'll send a pull request with this change after we start to figure out how we'll do the formatters plugin, it's going to take about 3 weeks. I'm in the middle of a project and I have to conclude it first, but in the meantime I'm already thinking about the best approach. 😄 |
I wonder if there is any problem before we start implementing the functionality described in #5 to convert your entire base to es6 and a more modular formatting for the functions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: