You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We do not have concurrent_hash_set in oneTBB but you still can use concurrent_hash_map and just ignore the value (use something like bool to save some memory). @kboyarinov what do you think is it possible to extend concurrent_hash_map to support the set behavior?
@pavelkumbrasev@fdiedler
I think in theory it is possible to add a hash set container on top of concurrent_hash_map engine. Could you please explain your use case for such case as well as the performance issues with concurrent_unordered_set::clear to proper understand the motivation for such an extension?
Thanks in advance
Hi,
I see there is a concurrent_hash_map container but no concurrent_hash_set container in TBB. Is it possible to have concurrent_hash_set container ?
The concurrent_unordered_set seems to have poor performance in my application in the clear() operation.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: