-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Report more accurate MAC dates #54
Comments
I think that these embedded dates are indeed better than the file system dates, but there are some edge cases where they're just as misleading. I'm currently dealing a lot with the following scenario:
So perhaps just reporting all the dates is potentially the best way to go, and leave it up to the user to perform the detective work. This is why I think that the dateCreatedByApplication value in some PREMIS/METS files can't be automated too well. |
A related issue to consider with MAC dates is file timestamps not being preserved when files are carved from a disk image, either by tsk_recover or the UDF mount-and-copy routine. |
I just encountered another relevant use case: I acknowledge that this would probably involve scanning the files with tika/mediainfo/exiftool etc as well so it's a huge task. |
Connected to #53
Brunnhilde/Siegfried report on the file created and modified dates as they are in the file system where files are being scanned. Sometimes files contain more accurate timestamps within their internal metadata. If such dates are found, we should also report on or even prefer these dates, as they are likely to be more useful for an archivist.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: