You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As c52f8a8 fixed #14, the performance would be poor if remain only one instance of marshaller in our JAXBUtil.java.
A good way is to add and manage multiple jaxbMarshallers there, in a pool (e.g. of size=5), to feed a max concurrency of 5 for processing xml output to improve the performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Though the solo synchronized marshaller works fine and of enough performance in most test cases so far, we still decide to add a pool for marshallers and benchmark the performance since as v1.0 of aws-mock released, we will have more and more users asking for high concurrency tests with aws-mock.
In the meantime could you please put some information for the users as to what the performance looks like now. For example, I see that aws-mock can easily handle 600 concurrent requests. Thanks!
As c52f8a8 fixed #14, the performance would be poor if remain only one instance of marshaller in our JAXBUtil.java.
A good way is to add and manage multiple jaxbMarshallers there, in a pool (e.g. of size=5), to feed a max concurrency of 5 for processing xml output to improve the performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: