You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the new material notation formats, in some cases this optionis not working properly.
I have created a cube with these materials:
materialA
004__test__physDefault
test2__2__physDefault
cube__006__test_3__physNone
007__test4
The cube is exported well and all the material managed properly, no problem at all, they are all valid materials, but if I apply in this cube the Do material notation some materials are not well converted:
cube__01__materialA__physDefault
cube__02__004__test__physDefault <- this one is not valid
cube__03__test2_2__physDefault__physDefault <- this one is not valid
cube__04__test_3__physNone
cube__05__007__test4__physDefault <- this one is not valid
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This function could make use of the whole get_materials code renumbering the materials also. Check #192
The code of get_materials could call a function to retrieve the materials renumbered but not changing them in the blender file. A boolean param to the function could do the trick: rename them on blender file or just take them on the fly.
With the new material notation formats, in some cases this optionis not working properly.
I have created a cube with these materials:
The cube is exported well and all the material managed properly, no problem at all, they are all valid materials, but if I apply in this cube the Do material notation some materials are not well converted:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: