Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

needs transitivity! #1

Open
MrBenGriffin opened this issue Aug 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

needs transitivity! #1

MrBenGriffin opened this issue Aug 20, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@MrBenGriffin
Copy link

This is really great, but it would be better if each verb can be marked as either: ཐ་དད་པ། or ཐ་མི་དད་པ།
Not sure if I can really help with that...

@eroux
Copy link
Contributor

eroux commented Aug 20, 2016

If you take a look at my fork you'll see that I have started to format the "verbinator" in xml. It is a huge mine of information and contains transitivity, translation, many additional sources, etc. I didn't have time to properly finish, but if you have a little time I can give you some indications on what remains to be done...

@MrBenGriffin
Copy link
Author

MrBenGriffin commented Aug 20, 2016

Wow looks amazing!
I'm unfamiliar with the xml schema / grammar used for the verbinator. Is it a standard grammar, or if not can you point me to a description of the model? (Obviously I can work out the basics - but eg. it would be useful to know if there's a method for linking to related forms / honorifics, etc. and likewise know what restrictions there are on multiplicity and nestings).

@drupchen
Copy link

drupchen commented Apr 26, 2017

Please have a look at a parsed version of Verbinator.
I would like to have that file with the Tibetan in unicode instead of Wylie...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants