You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The privacy posture of the GeoHash CH is interesting. If it's always sent, then it leaks information about the user's rough location. If it's not always sent, perhaps because it's gated by user consent, then its presence (or lack thereof) contributes to the fingerprint surface of said client. It's probably worth touching on this tradeoff in the draft.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At a minimum, it's not clear to me from the draft if the Client Hint will only be sent if there was already a response header from the origin indicating that it accepts this particular hint. RFC 8942 describes some of the fingerprinting issues, but it's also a little wishy-washy on whether server-side opt-in is actually required.
The privacy posture of the GeoHash CH is interesting. If it's always sent, then it leaks information about the user's rough location. If it's not always sent, perhaps because it's gated by user consent, then its presence (or lack thereof) contributes to the fingerprint surface of said client. It's probably worth touching on this tradeoff in the draft.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: