You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For better balancing, it'll be good to align those to:
8xn150
8xn300
Main reasons are:
We're introducing Model nightly runs
We're introducing Op Sweeps nightly runs
We're introducing Model Analysis nightly runs
When we have more than 3 active PR, other ones are blocked. It's common to have more than 3 as there are other folks next to our core team that contribute to FFE (~9 additional collaborators)
We're planing to split our test runs to cover both n150 and n300 in parallel (e.g. push pipeline to run on both chip variants). This is mostly due to the inconsistencies we detected between n150 and n300.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we have:
For better balancing, it'll be good to align those to:
Main reasons are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: