Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enabling more CI runners in our pool #967

Open
nvukobratTT opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Enabling more CI runners in our pool #967

nvukobratTT opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@nvukobratTT
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, we have:

  • 4xn150
  • 2xn300

For better balancing, it'll be good to align those to:

  • 8xn150
  • 8xn300

Main reasons are:

  • We're introducing Model nightly runs
  • We're introducing Op Sweeps nightly runs
  • We're introducing Model Analysis nightly runs
  • When we have more than 3 active PR, other ones are blocked. It's common to have more than 3 as there are other folks next to our core team that contribute to FFE (~9 additional collaborators)
  • We're planing to split our test runs to cover both n150 and n300 in parallel (e.g. push pipeline to run on both chip variants). This is mostly due to the inconsistencies we detected between n150 and n300.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants