-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recommendations for performing GSEA on topics? #58
Comments
@AmosFong1 Any of the approaches that have been used for differential expression analyses could be used here as well; I do not have enough experience to say what is the best approach (and it may be different for different studies). In the Genome Biology paper, we performed a GSEA using the posterior mean LFC estimates. In that case, it would be testing for enrichment for the size of the changes. Alternatively, you could use the lfsrs, or another common approach is to set some threshold (e.g., based on lfsr or LFC), and test for enrichment of the gene sets above that threshold. My intuition is that the approach you are suggesting is similar to using the posterior mean LFC estimates (assuming you are shrinking the LFC estimates with |
Thanks @pcarbo, could you comment on why there are NA values for some lfsr? If I wanted to rank genes for GSEA based on lfsr, how should I handle NAs? |
@AmosFong1 This might happen if there is little to no variance in the LFC estimates; check the output de_analysis outputs such as "lower" and "upper". Increasing |
I was wondering if one of the maintainers could provide some recommendations on how to perform GSEA on fastTopics derived topics. Would it be sensible to rank genes by -log10(lfsr) * LFC (assuming lfsr is analogous to q-value)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: