You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently when users of the python and java interfaces construct an index with the float8 storage datatype, we automatically use a scaling ratio of <1, 127> (python, java).
While this seems like a sane default, it effectively automatically reduces the precision of the value space (by a factor of 127/actual_range I think?). For some use cases, known/expected input dimensional value boundaries may be, for example, between -10.0 to 10.0, in which case we would get a higher precision quantization by using a scalefactor of <1, 10>.
It would be good if we could expose this parameter within the constructors of the bindings since they're already available in core.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently when users of the python and java interfaces construct an index with the float8 storage datatype, we automatically use a scaling ratio of
<1, 127>
(python, java).While this seems like a sane default, it effectively automatically reduces the precision of the value space (by a factor of
127/actual_range
I think?). For some use cases, known/expected input dimensional value boundaries may be, for example, between-10.0 to 10.0
, in which case we would get a higher precision quantization by using a scalefactor of<1, 10>
.It would be good if we could expose this parameter within the constructors of the bindings since they're already available in core.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: