Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: [srv6] test_srv6_static_config.py fails to run on kvm testbed #16627

Open
yutongzhang-microsoft opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #16680
Open

[Bug]: [srv6] test_srv6_static_config.py fails to run on kvm testbed #16627

yutongzhang-microsoft opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #16680
Assignees

Comments

@yutongzhang-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

Issue Description

This test script was added in PR #16516, and fails to run on kvm testbeds

https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/67904c3ad1500b4096f4cde1?searchTestCase=test_srv6_static_config.py&testcase=srv6%2Ftest_srv6_static_config.py%7C%7C%7C2&type=console

Results you see

https://elastictest.org/scheduler/testplan/67904c3ad1500b4096f4cde1?searchTestCase=test_srv6_static_config.py&testcase=srv6%2Ftest_srv6_static_config.py%7C%7C%7C2&type=console

Results you expected to see

It should run on kvm or skip

Is it platform specific

generic

Relevant log output

Output of show version

Attach files (if any)

No response

@BYGX-wcr
Copy link
Contributor

This is because the bgpcfgd changes in PR has not been merged yet

@BYGX-wcr
Copy link
Contributor

@yutongzhang-microsoft , the test case should pass now. Can you please check if it is the case?

@yutongzhang-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yutongzhang-microsoft , the test case should pass now. Can you please check if it is the case?

Hi, @BYGX-wcr , let's revert #16627 and have a try.

@BYGX-wcr
Copy link
Contributor

I have raised the following PR to address this issue: #16680

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants