-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Command should fail if there is an error #3
Comments
Yes we should totally do this. |
I think failing on 5xx errors is probably reasonable - the error is thrown server side, it will result in a 5xx - what does |
According to https://www.gnu.org/software/wget/manual/html_node/Exit-Status.html, wget would exit with the status code 8.
|
Hi @ioquatix, how are you doing? I know I answered late, but is there any ways you could add this? |
Can you let me know if this is working for you? |
It works, but it lacks information to debug.
|
Okay, let me see if I can make this better, I ran into similar issues when using the new version in practice. |
as I am currently playing around with it, I see the following error:
I am not sure, if this is related. I am a bit surprise from this error. It is defined here, but as far as I can see it it never required |
And there is another issue, I ran into, which shows that I did not think too far... Yes I am interested, that the rackula fails, if certain pages can't be downloaded. Note: I am using Rackula, to create a static version of some screens of my app. All URLs of the index.html must be downloaded. All sub-links are not that relevant. (see https://librario-ui.web.app) |
First off: This gem is really cool! Thanks for building it
I had a syntax error in my application.
But Rackula just continues to crawl the site.
It would be cool if rackula would stop and exit with an error in such a case.
One way would be to add an option to fail on HTTP 500 responses, of even better: to identify such an exception as above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: